Keresés a vizsgálatok között
1 - 20 az 269 találatból
The Council of the European Union’s failure to reply to a request related to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/1002 of 21 June 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus
Csütörtök | 25 november 2021
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) addressed concerns regarding recruitment to its standing corps (case 1930/2021/FA)
Csütörtök | 18 november 2021
Decision on how the European Parliament dealt with traineeship applications from a person requesting special arrangements due to dyslexia (case 179/2021/VB)
Hétfő | 08 november 2021
The case was about how the European Parliament dealt with two traineeship applications from a person who requested special arrangements for his applications due to dyslexia.
After first having rejected the complainant’s application, Parliament decided to interview him and offered him a traineeship. As the complainant had a long absence from his traineeship for medical reasons, Parliament offered him the possibility to apply again. However, Parliament rejected the complainant’s new application.
The complainant took issue with how Parliament handled his traineeship applications and with how it informed him that he could reapply for a traineeship.
The Ombudsman finds that Parliament should have been clearer in its communication with the complainant regarding the possibility to apply for a second traineeship. However, she finds no maladministration in how Parliament dealt with the complainant’s traineeship applications. Similarly, the fact that Parliament deals with requests for special arrangements made by traineeship candidates on a case-by-case basis is a reasonable approach.
The Ombudsman makes a suggestion for improvement to Parliament regarding how it informs traineeship candidates of the possibility to request special assistance in the context of the application and selection procedure and of how they should make such a request.
Decision on whether the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) failed to ensure equal testing conditions in a staff selection procedure in the field of external relations (case 1796/2021/ABZ)
Péntek | 29 október 2021
Péntek | 29 október 2021
Decision on how the European Commission changed the sickness and accident insurance policy for Conference Interpreting Agents (552/2021/MMO)
Péntek | 15 október 2021
The case concerned a new insurance policy that the European Commission concluded with a private insurance company to provide accident and sickness insurance for Conference Interpreting Agents (ACIs).
The complainant is a former ACI who considered that the conditions of the new insurance policy were very disadvantageous compared to the previous policy, and that it discriminated against certain ACIs.
During the inquiry, it became clear that the complainant would be less disadvantaged than he had feared. The Ombudsman found that the Commission’s explanations for the changes in the policy are convincing and reasonable. The inquiry also uncovered no evidence that would call into question the procedure leading to the new insurance contract, which included consultation with the international interpreters’ association.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by the Commission.
Az Európai Unió költségvetésére alkalmazandó pénzügyi szabályok területére vonatkozó személyzeti kiválasztási eljárással kapcsolatos panasz Európai Személyzeti Felvételi Hivatal (EPSO) általi kezelése
Csütörtök | 14 október 2021
Decision on how the European Commission takes into account work experience in staff selection procedures (case 1124/2021/LM)
Csütörtök | 29 július 2021
Hétfő | 26 július 2021
Az Európai Gyógyszerügynökség mulasztása arra vonatkozóan, hogy válaszoljon az ivermektin Covid19 megelőzésére vagy kezelésére szolgáló gyógyszerként való alkalmazása elleni tanácsával kapcsolatos panaszra
Kedd | 20 július 2021
Hétfő | 19 július 2021
Egy, a nemzetközi együttműködés területére uniós alkalmazottak kiválasztására irányuló eljárásában tapasztalt nyelvi megkülönböztetéssel kapcsolatban felvetett aggályoknak az Európai Személyzeti Felvételi Hivatal (EPSO) általi kezelése
Kedd | 13 július 2021
Concerns about the European Investment Bank possessing sensitive personal data of job applicants prior to job interviews
Hétfő | 12 július 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Investment Bank (EIB) on its practice of requesting sensitive personal data from job applicants in the context of recruitment procedures
Csütörtök | 08 július 2021
How the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
Hétfő | 05 július 2021
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (joint cases 1242/2020/SF and 1380/2020/SF)
Csütörtök | 01 július 2021
The complaints concerned the European Commission’s decision not to extend funding for those carrying out research under the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Programme (MSCA) following the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers. The complainants considered that the measures the Commission put in place to support MSCA researchers during the COVID-19 crisis were insufficient, as they would not enable them to continue their work.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry into how the Commission communicated with project partners that received grants under the MSCA, and the researchers carrying out the work for those project partners, about the measures they could take to address the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on their projects.
During the inquiry, the Ombudsman shared her preliminary findings with the Commission. In particular, the inquiry showed that, overall, the Commission had taken appropriate action to communicate the measures that could be taken to support researchers according to the applicable rules. However, as no solution had been found for the complainants, she urged the Commission to explore whether additional funding could exceptionally be awarded to the complainants and researchers in similarly difficult situations.
The Commission broadly accepted the Ombudsman’s preliminary findings but reiterated that, due to legal and financial constraints, it cannot provide any exceptional funding.
The Ombudsman appreciates the difficult situation faced by many MSCA researchers due to the COVID-19 crisis. At the same time, she acknowledges the Commission’s commitment to find solutions within the applicable rules for those researchers impacted. While it is regrettable that a solution could not be found for the complainants and researchers in similar situations, the Ombudsman closed the case as further inquiries would not result in a more satisfactory outcome for the complainants. However, she made two suggestions for improvement.
Decision on how the European External Action Service (EEAS) handled e-mails about an EU citizen’s personal situation in Switzerland (case 1011/2021/ABZ)
Kedd | 29 június 2021
Az Európai Bizottság és a panaszos CHAP(2017)01280 számú kötelezettszegési panasz állásáról való tájékoztatásának elmulasztása, a tanulmányi ösztöndíjakról szóló osztrák törvény
Hétfő | 28 június 2021
Azzal kapcsolatos aggályok, hogy az állásra jelentkezőkre vonatkozó érzékeny személyes adatok már az állásinterjúk előtt az Európai Beruházási Bank birtokában voltak
Hétfő | 21 június 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 981/2021//DL on how the European Commission replied to a request for information concerning the digital COVID-19 certificates
Péntek | 11 június 2021