Top inquiries
Showing 1 - 10 of 563 results
The European Border and Coast Guard's (Frontex) refusal to give public access to documents concerning the return of migrants
Inquiry 1093/2025/TM - Latest document added: Decision - Friday | 09 October 2026
The complainant asked the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) for access to documents related to Joint Return Operations (JROs) and National Return Operations (NROs) it coordinated between 1 July 2024 and 31 December 2024.
How the European Commission assessed energy consumption provisions of the Code of Practice related to the AI Act
Inquiry 3162/2025/MIK - Latest document added: Decision - Thursday | 08 October 2026
The complainant, a Member of the European Parliament, raised concerns with the European Commission regarding provisions in the Code of Practice for the implementation of the AI Act in relation to general-purpose AI, specifically concerning energy consumption. In particular, he pointed out alleged discrepancies between the requirements imposed by the Act on providers of general-purpose AI systems a...
The refusal by the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) to give public access to documents concerning the extraction of information from communication devices of migrants
Inquiry 842/2025/AML - Latest document added: Decision - Thursday | 08 October 2026
The complainant asked the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) to give public access to documents concerning the extraction of information from communication devices of migrants. Eurojust identified seven documents as falling within the scope of the request, six of which were not already public, and gave access to parts of these documents. Concerning the redacted infor...
How the European Commission handled an infringement complaint against Lithuania concerning the online publication of the personal data of conscripts
Inquiry 1723/2026/AML - Latest document added: Case description - Tuesday | 29 September 2026
The complainant raised concerns with how the European Commission handled an infringement complaint against Lithuania related to potential violations of EU personal data protection rules in connection to its yearly publication of a list of army conscripts. In particular, the complainant alleged that the Commission had failed to address the arguments and evidence they submitted to the Commission aft...
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to a text message sent by an EU Head of State to the Commission President concerning the EU-Mercosur trade negotiations
Inquiry 2482/2025/NH - Latest document added: Correspondence - Friday | 18 September 2026
The complainant, a journalist, asked the European Commission to grant public access to a text message sent by an EU Head of State to the Commission President concerning the EU-Mercosur trade negotiations. The Commission confirmed that its President had received the text message but noted that the message had been received via the instant messaging application ‘Signal’, which had had the ‘disappear...
How the European Commission (DG TRADE) handles interactions with the tobacco industry
Inquiry 1036/2026/AML - Latest document added: Case description - Thursday | 20 August 2026
The complainant, a non-governmental organisation, raised concerns about how the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Trade and Economic Security (DG TRADE) handles interactions with representatives of the tobacco industry. Specifically, the complainant argues that DG TRADE has engaged in regular, non-necessary, and non-transparent interactions with the tobacco industry in breach of the Wo...
How the European Data Protection Board adopted its opinion on the use of facial recognition in airports
Inquiry 850/2026/VSF - Latest document added: Case description - Wednesday | 19 August 2026
The complainant raised concerns with how the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) adopted an opinion on the use of facial recognition in airports. In particular, the complainant asserted that the EDPB had negatively affected the rights and interests of stakeholders by failing to consult with interested parties before adopting its opinion.
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents related to a lithium mining project in Serbia that was designated as a 'strategic project' under the Critical Raw Materials Act
Inquiry 3238/2025/MIG - Latest document added: Decision - Monday | 20 July 2026
The complainant asked the European Commission for public access to an approval letter it had received from the Serbian authorities concerning the designation of the Jadar mining project in Serbia as a ‘strategic project’ under the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act. The Commission refused access to the document. In doing so, it invoked an exception under the EU legislation on public access to documen...
How the European Commission handled a request for public access to documents related to projects seeking the status of ‘Strategic Project’ under the Critical Raw Materials Act
Inquiry 1855/2025/PVV - Latest document added: Recommendation - Friday | 17 July 2026
The complainant asked the European Commission to grant public access to documents related to the applications of mineral extraction and processing projects to be recognised as ‘strategic projects’ under the Critical Raw Materials Act. The Commission refused access, arguing that it could be generally presumed that disclosure of most of the documents would undermine the commercial interests of the c...
How the European Commission ensures that 'reality check' consultations meet transparency requirements
Inquiry 1029/2026/KR - Latest document added: Case description - Wednesday | 08 July 2026
The complainant raised concerns about the European Commission exempting so-called ‘reality checks’ from its standard transparency measures. Reality checks are a form of consultation with representatives of companies carried out in the context of the Commission’s work to simplify EU legislation.