Areas of work
The European Ombudsman’s work covers a broad spectrum of issues. Her work is organised on the website under the following general categories:
Top cases
Ombudswoman opens inquiry into transparency of Commission’s ‘reality checks’ with stakeholders
Wednesday | 08 July 2026
European Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho has opened an inquiry to examine how the European Commission ensures that its ‘reality checks’ meetings with stakeholders follow transparency requirements for decision-making.
Urgent decision-making procedures need further monitoring, says Ombudswoman
Thursday | 25 June 2026
European Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho has concluded that the European Commission’s response to her findings related to the preparation of urgent legislative proposals is overall constructive, but remains too general to allow her to determine whether future urgent law-making will be sufficiently transparent, evidence-based, and inclusive. The Ombudswoman will therefore continue to monitor the situation through future complaints.
EU Asylum Agency asked to improve how it conducts interviews with asylum seekers
Monday | 06 July 2026
European Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho has found several instances of maladministration in how the EU Agency for Asylum (EUAA) supports Greek authorities in processing asylum applications.
Ombudswoman welcomes EU personnel office’s commitment to improve how it handles requests for review
Wednesday | 15 July 2026
European Ombudswoman Teresa Anjinho has welcomed the commitment by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) to handle more efficiently candidates’ requests for review in the context of EU civil service selection procedures.
EPSO said it is working on a new platform which will sort review requests into different categories – such as those concerning test results or eligibility - so they can be treated more quickly.
The measure follows an inquiry by the Ombudswoman which revealed issues with EPSO’s standard replies to requests for review.
The inquiry concerned requests for review from a candidate who was unsuccessful in two procedures. The Ombudswoman found that there were inconsistencies in the replies the person received from EPSO and that it was unclear whether EPSO had reviewed its initial decisions.
As part of its improved measures, EPSO committed to make clear on its website that if a person wants to challenge a decision by the selection board, they should provide evidence to support their claims. EPSO will also ensure that candidates receive clear information on whether their performance has been reviewed by the board and an explanation if it has not been reviewed.
The Ombudsman Office has conducted a series of inquiries related to EPSO and has consistently reiterated that it has a duty to provide candidates with clear, accurate and complete information in the context of selection procedures it organises. This also applies to requests for review, which is the redress mechanism available to candidates to challenge a decision taken by the selection board.
The Ombudswoman will continue monitoring the implementation of these proposed new measures by EPSO on a case-by-case basis.