Iskanje po preiskavah
Prikaz rezultatov 1–20 od 81
Torek | 21 junij 2022
Closing note on the Strategic Initiative concerning the impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU (SI/3/2021/VS)
Petek | 17 junij 2022
Decision on how the European Commission applied the moderation policy for its staff intranet to a post on a discussion forum (case 9/2022/NH)
Sreda | 01 junij 2022
The case concerned a message related to the COVID-19 pandemic that was posted on the European Commission’s intranet forum, which is reserved for Commission staff members. The complainant, a Commission staff member, had reported the message as hate speech and wanted the Commission to remove it. The Commission refused and the complainant turned to the Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman found that the Commission’s decision not to remove the message was reasonable because it did not consider the message to be hate speech or contrary to its moderation policy. The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration in this case.
Evropska agencija za mejno in obalno stražo (Frontex) ni evidentirala in obravnavala prošnje za dostop javnosti do dokumentov
Sreda | 18 maj 2022
Report on the meeting between European Ombudsman representatives and European Data Protection Supervisor representatives
Četrtek | 31 marec 2022
Decision How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents concerning a procurement procedure related to strategic communication services (case 1838/2021/DL)
Četrtek | 17 marec 2022
The complainant sought public access to documents related to a procurement procedure organised by the European Commission.
The Commission granted access to parts of the documents only. It argued that fully disclosing the requested documents would undermine the privacy and the integrity of the persons mentioned, the tenderers’ commercial interests and the Commission’s internal decision-making.
The Ombudsman inquiry team inspected the documents in question and found that the tender bids contained detailed information about the winning tenderer’s strategies and methodologies and the key experts proposed by that tenderer. The other documents contained the Commission’s evaluation of the bids. All documents contained some personal data.
In light of this, the Ombudsman considered that the Commission’s refusal to grant public access to the documents was reasonable and in line with the EU legislation on public access to documents.
The Ombudsman thus closed the inquiry finding no maladministration.
Kako je Evropska komisija uporabila politiko moderiranja v zvezi z objavo na forumu za razpravo na intranetu uslužbencev
Četrtek | 20 januar 2022
Decision concerning how the European Parliament Citizens' Inquiries Unit replied to a request concerning social security in Latvia (Complaint 1953/2021/LM)
Torek | 23 november 2021
Petek | 19 november 2021
Torek | 16 november 2021
Kako je Evropska komisija (GD NEAR) obravnavala prošnjo za dostop javnosti do dokumentov v zvezi z razpisnim postopkom (GestDem 2021/1357)
Torek | 26 oktober 2021
Predstavništvo Evropske komisije na Cipru ni odgovorilo na vprašanje v zvezi z antigenskimi testi za covid-19
Sreda | 28 julij 2021
Evropska agencija za zdravila se ni odzvala na pritožbo v zvezi z njenim odsvetovanjem uporabe ivermektina kot zdravila za preprečevanje ali zdravljenje covida-19
Torek | 20 julij 2021
Petek | 18 junij 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Petek | 18 junij 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Data Protection Supervisor on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Petek | 18 junij 2021
Decision in case 616/2020/DL on how the European Commission dealt with a contractor that had not paid its consultants
Sreda | 19 maj 2021
The complainant worked as an expert for an external contractor to the EU Delegation to Ghana. Not having been paid for her work, the complainant turned to the Ombudsman, claiming that the EU Delegation had failed to ensure that the external contractor respects its obligations towards the experts.
The Ombudsman found that both the EU Delegation and the European Commission had acted in accordance with the applicable rules when withholding some payments under the contract. She also found that they had taken appropriate action vis-a-vis the contractor to try to resolve the situation that affected the complainant. The Ombudsman considers that the Commission has adequate mechanisms in place to monitor contractors, and she trusts the Commission will use these mechanisms to monitor the situation and to take action within its remit if needed.
The Ombudsman therefore closed the case with a finding of no maladministration.
Evropska komisija ni potrdila prejema pritožbe v zvezi z zamenjavo ponudnika internetnih storitev v Nemčiji
Torek | 18 maj 2021
The European Commission’s failure to reply to concerns raised about a contract between the Commission President and a German public relations company
Četrtek | 26 november 2020
Decision of the European Ombudsman in case 1555/2020/DL on the European Commission's failure to reply to concerns raised about a contract between the Commission President and a German public relations company
Torek | 24 november 2020