Anzeige 1-20 der 29 Treffer
Decision of the European Ombudsman concerning complaint 1140/2021/OAM against the European Commission
Donnerstag | 08 Juli 2021
Versäumnis der Europäischen Kommission, auf Fragen zu der Art und Weise einzugehen, wie sie bei Auswahlverfahren Erfahrungen berücksichtigt, die Bewerber vor Erlangung ihres Abschlusses gewonnen haben
Mittwoch | 21 April 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 119/2020/JN on how the European Court of Auditors handled a complaint about alleged irregularities in a public procurement procedure
Donnerstag | 11 Februar 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman on complaint 2108/2019/MH about the European Commission’s reply to correspondence concerning an infringement complaint against Ireland for possible breach of consumer protection and financial services laws
Montag | 16 Dezember 2019
Decision of the European Ombudsman concerning complaint 954/209/MMO against the European Commission on how that institution dealt with a complaint against Luxembourg for alleged failure to comply with the Medical Devices Directive 2007/47/EC [PMO(2019)2386148]
Montag | 15 Juli 2019
Umgang der Europäischen Kommission mit einer Vertragsverletzungsbeschwerde gegen luxemburgische Behörden aufgrund eines mutmaßlichen Verstoßes gegen die Richtlinie 2007/47/EG über Medizinprodukte
Dienstag | 18 Juni 2019
Décision dans l’affaire 233/2019/PL concernant une réponse insuffisante de la Commission européenne à une plainte relative à l’exclusion du programme «Erasmus +» des stages effectués au sein des institutions européennes
Montag | 01 April 2019
EAAS’s alleged failure to reply to a request for information and alleged lack of transparency concerning a call for project proposals, organised by the EU Delegation in Tirana, Albania
Montag | 18 März 2019
Decision in OI/4/2018/MMO on how the EU Delegation to Albania carried out a competition for young architects
Donnerstag | 14 März 2019
The case concerned a call for proposals drawn up and published by the EU Delegation to Albania in the context of the European Year of Cultural Heritage 2018. The call was aimed at young architects and involved project proposals for new bed and breakfast buildings. The Delegation assigned the task of running the competition to external contractors. One of the participating architects complained that the procedure lacked transparency and impartiality.
The Ombudsman found that the Delegation had ensured that the process was fair, objective and transparent. She closed the inquiry finding that there was no maladministration.
Unzureichende Antwort der Europäischen Kommission auf eine Beschwerde über ihre Politik, Praktika in europäischen Institutionen im Rahmen des Erasmus+-Programms von der Förderung auszuschließen
Mittwoch | 13 Februar 2019
Decision in case 342/2017/DR on the European Investment Bank’s rejection of a request for funding under the European Fund for Strategic Investments for a digital economy project in Guadeloupe
Freitag | 14 Dezember 2018
The case concerned the European Investment Bank’s (EIB) rejection of a request for funding, under the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), for a digital economy project in Guadeloupe.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry into how the EIB had dealt with the funding request and whether it had provided a reasonable explanation for rejecting it. The Ombudsman also looked into how the EIB’s Complaints Mechanism handled the subsequent complaint about the EIB’s decision to reject the request.
The Ombudsman found that, after the EIB-CM got involved, the EIB settled the matter of failure to reply to the complainant. For the rest, the Ombudsman found no maladministration. She identified, however, room for improvement in how the EIB-CM deals with matters that fall outside its remit and made a suggestion for improvement.
Decisione nel caso 1187/2018/LM sull’omessa risposta da parte della Commissione europea a corrispondenza relativa al progetto life/13/env/it/000169 finanziato dall’Unione europea
Mittwoch | 12 Dezember 2018
The European Commission’s failure to answer correspondence on the EU funded project life/13/env/it/000169
Montag | 23 Juli 2018
Decision in case 602/2017/AMF on the European Personnel Selection Office’s exclusion of a candidate from a selection procedure for EU civil servants because the application had not been submitted in the correct language
Donnerstag | 07 Juni 2018
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) excluded the complainant from a selection procedure for the recruitment of EU civil servants because he had not filled out his application in the correct language.
The complainant turned to the Ombudsman, who inquired into the issue. The rules for the recruitment procedure required applicants to fill out the application form in their chosen ‘second language’, which for the complainant was French. The complainant argued that he had merely used some English IT terminology. However, the Ombudsman found that he had described some of his professional experience entirely in English, by writing full sentences and not only using IT terminology. EPSO was thus right to exclude him from the selection procedure and the Ombudsman found no maladministration.
Angebliches Versäumnis des EAD, ein Informationsersuchen zu beantworten, und angeblicher Mangel an Transparenz im Zusammenhang mit einer von der EU-Delegation in Tirana (Albanien) organisierten Aufforderung zur Einreichung von Projektvorschlägen
Donnerstag | 31 Mai 2018
Decision in case 1100/2017/STI on allegedly inappropriate advice given by the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
Dienstag | 26 September 2017
The complainant is a Romanian citizen living in the Republic of Moldova. The case concerned allegedly inappropriate advice given by the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights related to the alleged discrimination at events organized under an EU funded project. The complainant moreover expressed criticism of the inability of the Fundamental Rights Agency to handle individual complaints.
The European Ombudsman found that the advice given to the complainant was extensive and appropriate. The Ombudsman could also confirm that the Agency for Fundamental Rights does not have a mandate to handle individual complaints about fundamental rights.
The Ombudsman found no maladministration and closed the case.
Decisión en el asunto 1192/2017/EIS en relación con la falta de respuesta de la Comisión Europea a la correspondencia relativa a un problema de derecho privado relacionado con la protección al consumidor
Montag | 25 September 2017
Decisión en el asunto 1071/2017/EIS en relación con la falta de respuesta del Parlamento Europeo a la correspondencia relativa a un problema de derecho privado relacionado con la protección al consumidor
Montag | 25 September 2017
Decision in case 132/2017/PL on the European Commission’s decision to close its examination of an infringement complaint about a sewage treatment plant in Spain before the complainant could send comments
Donnerstag | 21 September 2017
The case concerned the way the European Commission dealt with a complaint about a sewage treatment plant in Sabadell (Spain), which was financed through the EU’s Cohesion Fund. The complainant claimed that the Commission had failed to inform him that it would not further investigate the issue.
The Ombudsman’s inquiry into the matter confirmed that the Commission had not informed the complainant of its intention to close the case. The Ombudsman proposed, as a solution, that the Commission give the complainant the possibility to submit his comments on its decision. The Commission accepted this solution and the Ombudsman closed the case.
Decision in case 844/2017/AMF on the European Anti-Fraud Office´s (OLAF) handling of a complaint concerning working conditions in a Spanish airline
Mittwoch | 20 September 2017
The case concerned the European Anti-Fraud Office´s (OLAF) handling of a complaint regarding the working conditions in a Spanish airline. The complainant was dissatisfied with OLAF not investigating the matter.
The Ombudsman inquired into the issue and found nothing to suggest that the complainant’s concerns about the Spanish airline, if true, would affect the financial interests of the EU. Given the limits of OLAF’s mandate, OLAF did not commit maladministration when deciding not to investigate the airline.