Chcete podat stížnost na orgán či instituci EU?

Vyhledat šetření

Případ
Rozmezí dat
Klíčová slova
Případně zkuste stará klíčová slova (používaná do roku 2016)

Strana 1 – 20 z {totalResult}}

Decision on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a procedure for recruiting EU civil staff in the field of international cooperation (case 1353/2021/TM)

Čtvrtek | 21 dubna 2022

The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of international cooperation.

The Ombudsman found that the selection board had assessed the complainant’s application in line with the selection criteria. The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest that the selection board made a manifest error in assessing the complainant’s qualifications, and therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) carried out a selection procedure for officers in its Standing Corps (case 56/2021/NH)

Pátek | 04 března 2022

The case concerned the decision by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) not to select the complainant as an officer in its Standing Corps following an interview as part of a selection procedure. The complainant argued that his application had received unjustifiably low scores. In addition, the complainant was concerned that Frontex did not allow him to request a review of the decision.

The Ombudsman found that the selection board set up by Frontex had followed the vacancy notice when scoring the complainant’s application. Frontex confirmed that it had processed the complainant’s request for review, but acknowledged that the information provided to the complainant may not have been clear. In the course of the inquiry, Frontex implemented changes in its practices, which the Ombudsman welcomed.

The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by Frontex.

Decision in case 1310/2018/AMF on how the European Anti-Fraud Office handled allegations of fraud in the EU funding of a Latin-American human rights institution and a subsequent request for information

Pondělí | 12 listopadu 2018

The case concerned the European Anti-Fraud Office’s (OLAF) decision not to open an investigation into the complainant’s allegations of fraud in the allocation of EU funds to the Chilean National Human Rights Institution. The inquiry also covered OLAF’s handling of the complainant’s subsequent request for information on how to contact the European Ombudsman´s office.

The Ombudsman inquired into the issue and found nothing to suggest a manifest error in OLAF’s conclusion that the complainant’s allegations did not warrant an investigation.

However, OLAF could have been more service-minded in how it dealt with the complainant´s information request. The Ombudsman makes a suggestion for improvement in this regard.

Decision in case 1308/2016/PL about how the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency calculated the reimbursement of staff expenses of a grant recipient under the Lifelong Learning Programme

Pondělí | 29 října 2018

The case concerned how the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) calculated the reimbursement of staff expenses of the recipient of a grant under the Lifelong Learning Programme. The complainant questioned, in particular, the number of working days that the EACEA decided to take into account for reimbursement, following a recalculation of the applicable daily rate.

The Ombudsman inquired into the issue and found the EACEA’s recalculation to be reasonable.

The Ombudsman also found that the EACEA had dealt with the complainant’s request that it review its initial decision in line with its internal rules of procedure. In the absence of a concrete argument questioning the impartial character of the review process and given that the complainant’s request resulted in the EACEA recognising additional expenses, the Ombudsman closed the inquiry finding no maladministration.