Gäller ditt klagomål en EU-institution eller ett EU-organ?

Sök efter undersökningar

Textsökning

Dokumenttyp

Berörda institutioner

Typ av lösning

Ärendenummer

Språk

Datumspann

Nyckelord

Personalfrågor

Eller försök med gamla nyckelord (före 2016)

Visar 1 – 20 av 802 resultat

Decision in case 2208/2019/PL on how the European Personnel Selection Office calculated a candidate’s score in a selection procedure for EU staff

Måndag | 01 februari 2021

The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) calculation of the complainant’s score in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff.

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board calculated the complainant’s score. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 963/2020/VB on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed a candidate’s eligibility to participate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of audit

Onsdag | 06 januari 2021

The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s decision not to admit the complainant to a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of audit due to his lack of professional experience.

The Ombudsman found that the selection board had examined the information provided in the complainant’s application and assessed it against the eligibility criteria. The Ombudsman did not identify a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the application, and closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 553/2020/VB on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the education and experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of financial rules applicable to EU budget

Fredag | 11 december 2020

The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s education and professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of financial rules applicable to EU budget. 

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.