Aveți o plângere împotriva unei instituții sau unui organism al UE?
Căutare anchete
Afișare 1 - 20 din 426 rezultate
The failure of the European Commission to inform the complainant about its handling of an infringement complaint it submitted in July 2021
Vineri | 12 mai 2023
Ombudsmanul organizează o consultare publică privind transparența în procesul decizional al UE în domeniul mediului
Joi | 11 mai 2023
Neinformarea reclamantului de către Comisia Europeană cu privire la stadiul unei plângeri privind încălcarea dreptului UE împotriva Spaniei [CHAP (2021)1278]
Vineri | 21 aprilie 2023
The European Commission’s refusal to give full public access to documents concerning a Horizon 2020 mineral exploration research project
Miercuri | 19 aprilie 2023
Decision on the European Commission’s refusal to give full public access to documents concerning a Horizon 2020 mineral exploration research project (cases 1132/2022/OAM and 1374/2022/OAM)
Luni | 17 aprilie 2023
The case concerned the European Commission’s refusal to give full public access to documents concerning a Horizon 2020 mineral exploration research project implemented by a pan-European consortium. The complainant, an environmental organisation from Spain, was interested in the implementation of the project at a Spanish mine, San Finx.
The Commission granted only partial access to the documents, arguing that their full disclosure would have undermined the commercial interest of the consortium’s members.
After reviewing the documents, the Ombudsman considered that they contain information that can be understood as being “environmental information” within the meaning of the EU Aarhus Regulation. Such information should benefit from greater transparency. She asked the Commission to review its position with a view to granting the widest possible public access. The Commission maintained its position that no further access can be granted.
While the Ombudsman regretted the Commission’s decision not to disclose more parts of the documents at stake, she acknowledged that the Commission has already made information publicly available about the research project and, in particular, about the activities at the San Finx mine. In view of this, the Ombudsman considered that further inquiries into this matter are not justified.
Having said that, the Ombudsman is concerned about the Commission’s application of the EU Aarhus Regulation and the Aarhus Convention when assessing requests for public access to documents. She emphasised that the exceptions to granting public access have to be interpreted in a restrictive way as regards environmental information and reminded the Commission that transparency in this area is crucial to enhance the legitimacy of, and public trust in, the EU’s activities.
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents related to EU environmental strategy and legislation
Marți | 04 aprilie 2023
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on its refusal to give public access to documents related to EU environmental strategy and legislation
Luni | 27 martie 2023
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents concerning the adoption of EU rules on real driving emissions values
Vineri | 24 martie 2023
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents concerning the adoption of EU rules on real driving emissions values (case 1920/2022/NH)
Miercuri | 22 martie 2023
The complainant, a journalist, asked the European Commission for public access to documents concerning the adoption of EU rules on real driving emissions values. The Commission refused to grant access. In doing so, it invoked an exception under the EU's legislation on public access to documents, arguing that disclosure could undermine legal proceedings, as the matter had previously been subject to court proceedings and could be again in the future.
The Ombudsman inquiry team inspected the documents in question and confirmed that they contain internal legal advice concerning a judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018. The Ombudsman found that, in view of the specific context of the case, it was reasonable for the Commission to assume that the same subject matter would be challenged in court again.
She therefore considered that the Commission was justified in protecting the confidentiality of four out of five documents at this stage, and concluded that there was no maladministration.
The fifth document is an official Commission decision to appeal to the Court. The Ombudsman’s view is that this document could be made public, in particular because the Commission’s arguments (as presented to the Court) are reflected in the publicly available opinion of the Advocate General. However, since this document was not the main document at issue of the complaint, the Ombudsman does not find it justified to prolong the inquiry into this matter. She trusts that the Commission will look at the document again and reconsider its position.
Timpul de care a avut nevoie Comisia Europeană pentru a finaliza o anchetă privind încălcarea dreptului UE în ceea ce privește vânătoarea de lupi în Suedia
Miercuri | 15 martie 2023
How the European Commission adopted a guidance document on comparative assessment in the context of the substitution of hazardous substances in pesticides
Marți | 28 februarie 2023
Adoptarea de către Comisia Europeană a unui document de orientare privind evaluarea comparativă în contextul înlocuirii substanțelor periculoase din pesticide
Vineri | 24 februarie 2023
How the European Investment Bank (EIB) handled the move of a former Vice-President to an energy utilities company that had received EIB loans
Joi | 19 ianuarie 2023
Reply from the European Commission to the European Ombudsman proposal for a solution concerning the European Commission’s refusal to give full public access to documents concerning a Horizon 2020 mineral exploration research project
Miercuri | 11 ianuarie 2023
Reply from the European Investment Bank (EIB) on the implementation of suggestions made by the European Ombudsman in case 1016/2021/KR
Joi | 22 decembrie 2022
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents concerning the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas (ENTSOG)
Marți | 20 decembrie 2022
Ecologistas en Acción contribution to the Public Consultation SI/5/2022/KR, “Transparency and Participation in EU decision making related to the environment”
Vineri | 16 decembrie 2022
Tratarea de către Comisia Europeană a unei cereri de acces public la documentele privind Rețeaua europeană a operatorilor de sisteme de transport de gaze naturale (ENTSOG)
Vineri | 16 decembrie 2022