Imate li pritužbu protiv institucije ili tijela EU-a?

Pretraživanje istraga

Pretraživanje teksta

Vrsta dokumenta

Predmetna institucija

Vrsta rješenja

Broj slučaja

Jezik

Raspon datuma

Ključne riječi

Ili pokušajte sa starim ključnim riječima (prije 2016.)

Regionalna politika i koordinacija strukturnih instrumenata

Prikazuju se 1 - 20 od 61 rezultata

Decision in case 960/2016/TM on the European Investment Bank´s alleged failure to handle a complaint in a timely manner

Ponedjeljak | 04 prosinca 2017

The case concerned the alleged failure of the European Investment Bank (EIB) Complaints Mechanism to handle a complaint in a timely manner. The Ombudsman inquired into the issue and found that the delay was justified due to the complexity of the subject matter of the complaint. The Ombudsman therefore found no maladministration by the EIB.

Decision in case 1102/2016/JN on the Commission’s failure to reply to correspondence and to fully disclose a document

Petak | 13 siječnja 2017

The case concerned the Commission’s failure to reply to the complainant’s correspondence in the context of a financial audit at the Member State level. Following the Ombudsman’s intervention, the Commission replied. It disclosed the document requested by the complainant but redacted some personal data (names of physical persons). The Ombudsman found that the Commission correctly justified the redaction under Regulation 45/2001.

Decision of the European Ombudsman in case 1229/2014/ZA on OLAF's handling of allegations concerning mismanagement of EU funds in Greece

Ponedjeljak | 12 listopada 2015

The complainant informed OLAF of alleged mismanagement of EU funds in Greece. OLAF failed to acknowledge the complainant's correspondence and failed also to inform the complainant of whatever action it had taken and of the outcome. Following the Ombudsman's intervention, OLAF acknowledged the procedural shortcomings in its handling of the case and apologised. It also took steps to avoid similar situations in the future. Finally, OLAF informed the complainant of the steps it had taken as regards the substance of its case. The Ombudsman concluded that OLAF had settled the complaint. However the Ombudsman made a further remark with a view to improving OLAF procedures as regards its monitoring of closed cases transmitted to competent national authorities.

Odluka u predmetu OI/8/2014/AN - Poštovanje temeljnih prava pri provedbi kohezijske politike EU-a

Ponedjeljak | 11 svibnja 2015

Ovom se istragom na vlastitu inicijativu željelo utvrditi kako Europska komisija jamči poštovanje temeljnih prava ugrađenih u Povelju Europske unije o temeljnim pravima prilikom provedbe kohezijske politike EU-a u državama članicama. Istraga je pokrenuta kad je Unija započela novo sedmogodišnje razdoblje financiranja, od 2014. do 2020., unutar novog pravnog okvira.

Kohezijskom politikom EU-a nastoje se smanjiti razlike s obzirom na stupanj razvijenosti pojedinih regija u EU-u. S obzirom na vidljivost Unije u projektima koji se financiraju iz fondova kohezijske politike, od unapređenja hitne službe u Rumunjskoj do razminiranja u Hrvatskoj, Ombudsmanica vjeruje da bi Komisija trebala poduzeti sve što je u njezinoj moći kako bi zajamčila poštovanje temeljnih prava prilikom trošenja sredstava tih fondova. Činjenica da Komisija nije izravno odgovorna za upravljanje fondovima ne bi smjela biti razlogom za izostanak djelovanja ako dođe do povrede temeljnih prava ili postoji opasnost za to.

Istragom na vlastitu inicijativu bili su obuhvaćeni Komisija, nacionalni pučki pravobranitelji i predstavnici civilnog društva. Na temelju informacija dobivenih od njih, Ombudsmanica je donijela osam smjernica u cilju poboljšanja stanja kako bi pomogla Komisiji u nadzoru nad državama članicama u tom području.

Contribution from LUMOS

Ponedjeljak | 23 ožujka 2015

Contribution from Eurochild

Petak | 06 ožujka 2015

Decision of the European Ombudsman closing the inquiry into complaint 1205/2013/JF against the European Commission

Četvrtak | 05 ožujka 2015

The case concerned a Swedish company that participated in a project financed by the European Commission's FP7 programme. Whilst the project was being implemented, the Commission decided to audit the company. The company disagreed with the audit results and, after the Commission had confirmed them, lodged a complaint with the European Ombudsman alleging a lack of objectivity on the part of the Commission and a failure to comply with the applicable rules.

The Ombudsman inquired into the issue and found no maladministration by the Commission. In particular, the audit results relating to the company's labour costs were based on the information that was available to the Commission at the relevant time. She suggested to the complainant that if it has further evidence, it consider submitting it to the Commission for its consideration. As regards the calculation of the company's productive time, the information which the complainant provided did not appear to be sufficient to permit the Commission to calculate the actual individual productive time, in accordance with the requirements of the FP7 rules. Consequently, the Ombudsman closed the case.

Contribution from ENIL-ECCL

Srijeda | 25 veljače 2015