Søg efter undersøgelser
Viser 1 - 20 af 364 resultater
Décision sur la manière dont la Délégation de l’Union européene en Tunisie a géré le remplacement du chef d’équipe dans le cadre d’un projet financé par l’Union européenne (plainte 1385/2021/JN)
Torsdag | 25 november 2021
Mandag | 22 november 2021
Fredag | 19 november 2021
How the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) evaluates bids in tendering procedures for the provision of translation services
Mandag | 15 november 2021
How the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) applied a scoring methodology in two staff selection procedures
Onsdag | 17 november 2021
Decision on whether the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) failed to ensure equal testing conditions in a staff selection procedure in the field of external relations (case 1796/2021/ABZ)
Fredag | 29 oktober 2021
Decision on how the European Commission changed the sickness and accident insurance policy for Conference Interpreting Agents (552/2021/MMO)
Fredag | 15 oktober 2021
The case concerned a new insurance policy that the European Commission concluded with a private insurance company to provide accident and sickness insurance for Conference Interpreting Agents (ACIs).
The complainant is a former ACI who considered that the conditions of the new insurance policy were very disadvantageous compared to the previous policy, and that it discriminated against certain ACIs.
During the inquiry, it became clear that the complainant would be less disadvantaged than he had feared. The Ombudsman found that the Commission’s explanations for the changes in the policy are convincing and reasonable. The inquiry also uncovered no evidence that would call into question the procedure leading to the new insurance contract, which included consultation with the international interpreters’ association.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by the Commission.
Decision on the European Commission’s decision to recover grants paid under EU funded projects carried out by a national police authority (case 1733/2020/LM)
Mandag | 11 oktober 2021
The complainant, a national police force, received two grants from the European Commission for projects to fight transnational crime, which it carried out successfully. Following audits of the projects, the Commission found that a big part of the costs were ineligible mainly due to the lack of supporting documents. The Commission therefore decided to recover a considerable part of the grants. The complainant turned to the Ombudsman arguing that the decision was disproportionate and that the Commission had not shown flexibility. The complainant considered that the Commission should have allowed it more time to send additional supporting documents and that it should have done another audit.
The Ombudsman found that it was reasonable for the Commission to conclude that the complainant had violated its contractual obligations under the ‘grant agreement’. The Commission had acted in accordance with EU financial rules and given the complainant ample opportunity to provide comments and submit additional supporting documents as proof of the costs it claimed. The Commission had also shown flexibility by agreeing to review supporting documents submitted late. The Ombudsman thus closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Det Europæiske Lægemiddelagenturs undladelse af at besvare en klage vedrørende dets råd mod brugen af ivermectin som lægemiddel til forebyggelse eller behandling af covid-19
Tirsdag | 20 juli 2021
Mandag | 19 juli 2021
Europa-Kommissionens undladelse af at besvare en henvendelse fra en ansøger om den nye europæiske Bauhaus-pris 2021
Fredag | 16 juli 2021
Europa-Kommissionens undladelse af at besvare en klage over afvisningen af en ansøgning om den nye europæiske Bauhaus-pris 2021
Tirsdag | 13 juli 2021
Decision concerning the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) rejecting as ineligible certain costs in the context of an EU-funded project (case 341/2021/LM)
Mandag | 28 juni 2021
Europa-Kommissionens undladelse af at besvare korrespondance om påståede uregelmæssigheder i en offentlig udbudsprocedure
Tirsdag | 22 juni 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Fredag | 18 juni 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Data Protection Supervisor on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Fredag | 18 juni 2021
Hvordan Europa-Kommissionen gennemførte den proces, der førte til en ændring af syge- og ulykkesforsikringen for hjælpeansatte konferencetolke
Fredag | 04 juni 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the above case on how the European Commission handled a conflict between beneficiaries of EU funding under the Erasmus+ programme
Tirsdag | 25 maj 2021
Entscheidung des Europäischen Bürgerbeauftragten über die Beschwerde 832/2021/SF gegen das Europäische Parlament
Onsdag | 19 maj 2021
Decision in case 964/2020/JN on how the European Commission evaluated a tender in a public procurement procedure for the translation of a report on the judicial reform in Cyprus
Tirsdag | 11 maj 2021
The case concerned the European Commission´s decision to reject a tender in a public procurement procedure for the translation of a report on the judicial reform in Cyprus. The complainant considered that the Commission had been wrong in rejecting his tender because it considered he did not meet the specifications for the required experience. In the complainant’s view, the Commission should have asked him for clarifications.
The Ombudsman found that the Commission acted reasonably, and closed the inquiry finding no maladministration. She trusts that, going forward, the Commission will ensure that unsuccessful tenderers receive an adequate explanation of the reasons why their tender has been rejected, without having to ask for clarification.