Rādīt 1 - 20 no 402 rezultātiem
Decision on how the European Commission replied to a complaint alleging that Ireland breached EU rules on the European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (1108/2022/KT)
Piektdiena | 02 decembris 2022
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) dealt with a complaint about alleged irregularities in two selection procedures for contract staff (RCT-2017-00048 and Frontex/17/CA/FGIII/26.1) (case 174/2021/KT)
Trešdiena | 30 novembris 2022
The complainant took part in two selection procedures for contract staff, organised by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) in 2018 and 2019. He was dissatisfied with how Frontex dealt with his administrative complaint about the evaluation of his application in the 2018 selection procedure, in which he was unsuccessful. He also complained that Frontex had failed to reply to his request for feedback regarding the 2019 selection procedure.
In the course of the inquiry, Frontex provided the complainant with feedback regarding the 2019 selection procedure. As regards the 2018 selection procedure, the Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how Frontex had assessed the complainant’s application. However, the Ombudsman considered that Frontex had not dealt with the complainant’s administrative complaint in an entirely satisfactory manner.
Given that the inquiry revealed no manifest error of assessment, the Ombudsman considered that no additional inquiries would be justified into that aspect of the complaint. The Ombudsman suggested, however, that Frontex improve how it communicates to applicants the redress possibilities in the context of its staff selection procedures, as well as how it processes and keeps records of complaints by unsuccessful applicants.
Decision on incorrect information about a candidate’s status in the contract agents selection database (CAST) managed by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) (case 2090/2021/VB)
Piektdiena | 25 novembris 2022
The case concerned the status of an individual on the Contract Agent Selection Tool database (CAST database), from which EU institutions, bodies, offices or agencies may recruit contract agent staff. The complainant had passed the selection tests and was included in the database, which is administered by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), but she was mistakenly indicated as ‘recruited’ for a period of more than four years.
The Ombudsman found that the complainant may have lost out on the opportunity to be recruited by EU institutions using the CAST database during that period. The Ombudsman proposed to EPSO, as a solution, that it extend the validity of the complainant’s status in the database for the same amount of time as the time during which she had been mistakenly marked as recruited. EPSO accepted the proposal.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that EPSO had settled the issue. To prevent such issues occurring in the future, she suggested that EPSO take action to ensure that, every time a candidate’s status in the CAST database is changed, they receive an automatic email informing them of the change.
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) and its failure to reply to a complaint concerning technical difficulties in a selection procedure for linguistic assistants (EPSO/AST/152/22)
Otrdiena | 15 novembris 2022
Decision on how the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) evaluates tenders in procurement procedures for the provision of translation services (case 1841/2021/ABZ)
Trešdiena | 09 novembris 2022
The case concerned how the Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union (CdT) evaluated tenders in two procurement procedures for the provision of translation services. The complainant argued that the CdT was inconsistent in its evaluation, given that it had assessed its tenders differently in the past. It also argued that the CdT had wrongly assessed the complainant’s tenders against two criteria set out in the calls for tenders.
The Ombudsman found that the CdT correctly followed the methodology it put in place for assessing the tenders in the two procedures. She also took the view that there was no indication of a manifest error in how the CdT assessed the complainant’s tenders.
On that basis, the Ombudsman considered that there was no maladministration by the CdT and she closed the case. Nevertheless, the Ombudsman trusts that the CdT will provide more detailed information to tenderers about its assessment in future procedures, as clearer information at an early stage may reduce the risk of complaints such as the one that led to this inquiry.
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a request to extend the deadline for a retired staff member to request the ‘resettlement allowance’ (complaint 1428/2021/FA)
Pirmdiena | 07 novembris 2022
The case concerns the European Commission‘s refusal to extend the time limit for a retired staff member to request the resettlement allowance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The complainant argued that due to the outbreak of the pandemic, she was not able to organise her resettlement to her place of origin within the prescribed time limit and asked the Commission to grant her an extension.
The Ombudsman found that the decision of the Commission is in line with the Staff Regulations and EU case-law. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Kā Eiropas Komisija centās atgūt izmaksas pēc ES finansēta spīdzināšanas upuru rehabilitācijas projekta revīzijas
Ceturtdiena | 20 oktobris 2022
Kā Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra (Frontex) izskatīja sūdzību par līgumdarbinieku tiešsaistes testa veikšanu ((starptautiskās sadarbības speciālists (FG IV)-RCT-2022–00024)
Ceturtdiena | 20 oktobris 2022
Decision on the European Commission’s decision not to pursue an infringement complaint - CHAP(2021)02055, Ireland, alleged infringements of EU environmental law in Galway County, Ireland (case 1672/2022/EIS)
Pirmdiena | 03 oktobris 2022
Kā Eiropas Robežu un krasta apsardzes aģentūra (Frontex) organizēja tiešsaistes testu, lai pieņemtu darbā starptautiskās sadarbības speciālistus ((IVF) — RCT-2022–00024)
Otrdiena | 13 septembris 2022
Kā Atalgojuma un individuālo tiesību birojs izskatīja bijušā darbinieka bezdarbnieka pabalsta pieprasījumu
Otrdiena | 30 augusts 2022
Решение по жалба срещу Европейската комисия относно отговор на твърдения за нарушение на Хартата на основните права на ЕС от българските административни органи и Върховния административен съд на България (жалба 484/2022/ТМ)
Pirmdiena | 22 augusts 2022
Decision on how the European Commission addressed concerns about violation of fundamental rights of the Polish- and Russian-speaking population in Lithuania due to non-availability of the leaflets on medicinal products in the respective languages (case 1185/2022/KT)
Piektdiena | 15 jūlijs 2022
Decision on how the European Parliament took into account technical problems in a selection procedure for intercultural and language professionals (case 718/2022/PL)
Piektdiena | 01 jūlijs 2022
Kā Eiropas Personāla atlases birojs (EPSO) izvērtēja kandidāta pieteikumu atlases procedūrā uz administratoru vakancēm ārējo attiecību jomā (EPSO/AD/382/20)
Piektdiena | 01 jūlijs 2022
Otrdiena | 21 jūnijs 2022
Decision on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of international cooperation (case 270/2021/KT)
Pirmdiena | 20 jūnijs 2022
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of international cooperation.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications and, therefore, closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Closing note on the Strategic Initiative concerning the impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU (SI/3/2021/VS)
Piektdiena | 17 jūnijs 2022
Ceturtdiena | 02 jūnijs 2022
Eiropas Savienības Aviācijas drošības aģentūras (EASA) nespēja sniegt atbildi uz pieprasījumu par gaisa kuģu medicīniskā aprīkojuma atjauninātajiem standartiem
Pirmdiena | 30 maijs 2022