FOR PREVIEWING & TESTING PURPOSES ONLY.
This notification will disappear once the page will be published.
This link is available for less than 30 minutes.
  • Easy to read
  • Text size

You have a complaint against an EU institution or body?

Current language: 
  • English
Available languages: 

How the European Commission handled an infringement complaint against Italy concerning the remuneration and social security entitlements of foreign-language university lecturer

President

European Commission

 

 

Dear President,

I have received a complaint against the European Commission that concerns a subject that EU institutions have been dealing with for over 30 years, namely the discrimination on grounds of nationality of foreign-language lecturers in Italy. The matter has received much attention over time, in the press, academic literature and the European Parliament. The complainant is the chair of the Association of Foreign-Language Lecturers, which is, evidently, very involved in the matter.

In 2011, the complainant lodged an infringement complaint with the Commission, which ultimately led to the initiation of court proceedings against Italy in 2023 (Case C-519/23). The Commission withdrew the court action in the summer of 2025.

I have decided to open an inquiry into two issues that arise from the complaint:

a) Did the Commission keep the complainant appropriately informed after 19 September 2023 when the Commission said that it would keep him informed about new developments?

b) The Commission withdrew the court action and closed the complainant’s infringement complaint, without first seeking his views. The Commission has stated to the complainant that the withdrawal was a matter of urgency, without, according to the information submitted, explaining what the urgency consisted of and how it prevented the Commission from first seeking the views of the complainant. What hindered the Commission from first seeking the views of the complainant?[1]

I would appreciate receiving the Commission’s reply on these two issues within three months of the date of this letter. The complainant will receive a copy of this letter, as well as of the Commission’s reply. Both this letter and the Commission’s reply will also be published on the Ombudsman’s website.

Moreover, I have decided that it is necessary to inspect the following documents:

(i) all communications the Commission had with the complainant from July 2023, when it took the decision to bring the matter to court, until March 2025;

(ii) all other documents related to the infringement procedure and the court action in the period July 2023 until September 2025, when the Court issued its order on the withdrawal;

(iii) written documentation as to what is the internal procedure in the Commission for deciding whether a court action should be withdrawn and for deciding when it must be done as a matter of urgency.

Please provide the documents within eight weeks of the date of this letter. If the Commission considers the documents to be confidential, they will not be disclosed to the complainant or any other person without the prior agreement of the Commission[2]

If your services have any questions, please contact Mr Josef Nejedly, who is the inquiries officer in charge of this case.

Attached, please find a copy of the complaint.

Yours sincerely,

Teresa Anjinho
European Ombudsman

Strasbourg, 19/12/2025

 

[1] The European Ombudsman’s concern in general about seeking complainants’ views before the Commission closes infringement complaints was raised for instance in the Ombudsman’s decisions in cases 161/99/IJH: https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/decision/en/1160

and 104/2010/(IP)EIS: https://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/decision/en/12431

[2] Please clearly mark such material ‘Confidential’. Encrypted emails can be sent to our dedicated mailbox.