You have a complaint against an EU institution or body?

Search inquiries

Text search

Document type

Institution concerned

Type of settlement

Case number

Language

Date range

Keywords

Failure to reason decisions [Articles 18)

Or try old keywords (Before 2016)

Showing 1 - 20 of 341 results

Decision in case 553/2020/VB on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the education and experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of financial rules applicable to EU budget

Friday | 11 December 2020

The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s education and professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of financial rules applicable to EU budget. 

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 2231/2019/PL on how the European Personnel Selection Office calculated a candidate’s score in an interview in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of taxation

Monday | 23 November 2020

The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) calculated the complainant’s score in the field-related interview in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of taxation.

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board calculated the complainant’s score. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 183/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research

Friday | 20 November 2020

The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 194/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research

Friday | 20 November 2020

The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 211/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research

Friday | 20 November 2020

The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 216/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research

Friday | 20 November 2020

The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

Decision in case 576/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for recruiting conference operators to the EU civil service

Tuesday | 10 November 2020

The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting conference operators to the EU civil service.

The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.