You have a complaint against an EU institution or body?
Search inquiries
Showing 1 - 20 of 341 results
The European Commission’s decision not to include an organisation in a Working Group on combating antisemitism
Friday | 12 February 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 116/2021/SF on how the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA) evaluated a proposal for funding of a Jean Monnet Chair under the Erasmus+ programme
Wednesday | 10 February 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 11/2021/VB on how the European Commission assessed a candidate’s eligibility to participate in its traineeship programme
Wednesday | 03 February 2021
Décision du Médiateur européen concernant la plainte 34/2021/VB contre la Commission européenne relatif au traitement de votre candidature pour un poste d’agent contractuel
Friday | 29 January 2021
How the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
Tuesday | 22 December 2020
Decision in case 553/2020/VB on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the education and experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of financial rules applicable to EU budget
Friday | 11 December 2020
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s education and professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of financial rules applicable to EU budget.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)'s failure to reply to correspondence concerning the environmental certification of an Italian airport
Monday | 07 December 2020
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 1369/2020/JN on the European Commission´s decision to reject costs claimed in an EU funded project in the area of urban traffic
Thursday | 03 December 2020
European Commission's decision to include the complainant in the early detection and exclusion system (EDES)
Friday | 27 November 2020
Decision in case 2231/2019/PL on how the European Personnel Selection Office calculated a candidate’s score in an interview in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of taxation
Monday | 23 November 2020
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) calculated the complainant’s score in the field-related interview in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of taxation.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board calculated the complainant’s score. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in case 183/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research
Friday | 20 November 2020
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in case 194/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research
Friday | 20 November 2020
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in case 211/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research
Friday | 20 November 2020
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in case 216/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research
Friday | 20 November 2020
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
The Commission's alleged failure to address all issues in an infringement complaint concerning Danish rules related to leasing cars from other EU Member States
Thursday | 19 November 2020
Decision in case 576/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for recruiting conference operators to the EU civil service
Tuesday | 10 November 2020
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting conference operators to the EU civil service.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
The Research Executive Agency’s (REA) alleged failure properly to address cost claims made by an expert
Wednesday | 04 November 2020