Kas teil on kaebus
ELi institutsiooni või asutuse kohta?

Juhtumite lõppkokkuvõtted

Kuvatakse 1–10 kokku 767 tulemusest

Summary of the decision in case 21/2016/JAP on the Council of the EU’s failure to grant access to legal opinions on proposals for Regulations on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (EUROJUST)

Neljapäev | 07 märts 2019

The case concerned the refusal of the Council of the European Union to grant full access to legal opinions on the legislative proposals for Regulations on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (EUROJUST). In the course of the Ombudsman’s inquiry, the Council agreed to disclose two of the four documents,...

Summary of the decision in case 2034/2018/MIG on how the European Commission dealt with a request to approve a food decontaminant

Esmaspäev | 04 märts 2019

Food ‘decontaminants’ can be used in the EU only if the European Commission authorises their use. The complainant, a producer of food decontaminants, asked the Commission to authorise its product. The Commission did not approve the request. Dissatisfied with this decision, the applicant turned to the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman found that the Commission had dealt properly with the complainant’s appli...

Summary of the decision in case 2104/2018/MH on how the European Commission dealt with concerns about the employment law applicable to cabin crew

Kolmapäev | 27 veebruar 2019

The complainant is a Spanish trade union. European trade unions wrote to the European Commission calling on it to take appropriate action about their concerns relating to the failure of some Member States to apply local employment laws to cabin crew in the airline sector. The complainant turned to the Ombudsman because it was not satisfied with the Commission’s response. The Ombudsman found that t...

Decision in case 476/2018/EA on the information made available by the European Commission about an ‘expert group’ on defence research

Reede | 22 veebruar 2019

The case concerned the information made available by the European Commission about the As-If Programme Committee for Defence Research, which advises the Commission on defence research. The complainant contended that the information on the Commission’s register of ‘expert groups’ was not up-to-date. The Ombudsman found that the Commission had updated the register by adding the agendas and minutes o...

Summary of the decision in case 1830/2017/SRS on how the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) selects external experts to provide scientific advice

Reede | 08 veebruar 2019

This case concerned how the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) selected experts to take part in a working group, which drafted an opinion on the use of non-human primates in research. The complainant argued that the procedure to select the experts was not transparent and that the Commission had not ensured a plurality of views within ...

Summary of the decision of the European Ombudsman in case 2111/2017/MDC on the time taken by the European Commission to review the Cosmetics Regulation with regard to substances with endocrine-disrupting properties

Neljapäev | 07 veebruar 2019

The complaint concerned the time taken by the European Commission to complete a review of the EU regulation governing the safety of cosmetic products (Cosmetics Regulation). The complainant claimed that the Commission was taking too long to carry out the review to take account of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. The review was finally completed in November 2018, more than two years...

Summary of the decision in case 268/2017/MH on how the European Commission dealt with an application to authorise formaldehyde as an additive to animal feed

Esmaspäev | 04 veebruar 2019

The complaint concerned how the European Commission dealt with an application for formaldehyde to be authorised as an additive to animal feed. The complainant considered that the Commission had lacked objectivity, was politically-motivated and had not sufficiently taken into account scientific opinion in proposing to refuse the authorisation of formaldehyde. The complainant also considered that th...

Summary of the decisionin case 23/2018/SRS on how the European Commission updates EU rules on chemical testing when alternative test methods are identified

Kolmapäev | 30 jaanuar 2019

This case concerned how the European Commission deals with updates of the Test Method Regulation (TMR), which defines the approved methods for chemical testing in the EU. The Commission is obliged to update the regulation when it identifies a potential alternative test method to current testing on animals. The complainant is of the view that the TMR can be updated without the need for the test met...

Kokkuvõte Euroopa Ombudsmani otsusest lõpetada strateegiline uurimine OI/6/2017/EA küsimuses, kuidas Euroopa Komisjon tagab puuetega inimeste juurdepääsu oma veebilehtedele

Neljapäev | 20 detsember 2018

Ombudsman uuris, kuidas Euroopa Komisjon tagab, et tema veebilehed ja tema poolt kättesaadavaks tehtud veebipõhised vahendid on puuetega inimestele juurdepääsetavad. Ombudsman küsis komisjonilt juurdepääsetavate vormingute (näiteks „kergesti loetav”) kasutamise kohta ning kuidas komisjon võimaldab kasutajatel anda tagasisidet juurdepääsetavuse kohta ja millist koolitust ta pakub töötajatele juurde...

Kokkuvõte: otsus juhtumi 1747/2018/FP kohta, mis käsitleb Euroopa Komisjoni keeldumist anda juurdepääs seadusandliku muudatusega seotud dokumentidele

Kolmapäev | 28 november 2018

Juhtum käsitleb asjaolu, et Euroopa Komisjon keeldus andmast loomade õigustega tegelevale vabaühendusele avalikku juurdepääsu dokumentidele, mis käsitlevad arvutusi, millega hinnati loomade kasutamist kemikaalimäärust REACH muutvale määruse eelnõule lisatava mõjuhinnangu kavandis. Komisjon ei võimaldanud dokumentidega tutvuda, sest nende avalikustamine oleks tõsiselt kahjustanud tema otsustusprots...