The concept of good administration is, however, broader than the concept of legality. While it was not illegal for OLAF to transfer its findings to the UK authorities without granting the complainant a formal right to be heard, this does not automatically imply that OLAF should not have, in compliance with principles of good administration, informed the complainant of the allegations against it, and the evidence supporting those allegations, before finalising its position on those allegations and evidence. The Ombudsman takes the view that, by subjecting its findings to scrutiny and challenge, OLAF can enhance their certainty and validity.