Chcete podat stížnost na
orgán či instituci EU?

Shrnutí uzavřených případů

Strana 1 – 10 z {totalResult}}

Summary of the decision in case 21/2016/JAP on the Council of the EU’s failure to grant access to legal opinions on proposals for Regulations on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (EUROJUST)

Čtvrtek | 07 března 2019

The case concerned the refusal of the Council of the European Union to grant full access to legal opinions on the legislative proposals for Regulations on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and on the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (EUROJUST). In the course of the Ombudsman’s inquiry, the Council agreed to disclose two of the four documents,...

Summary of the decision in case 2034/2018/MIG on how the European Commission dealt with a request to approve a food decontaminant

Pondělí | 04 března 2019

Food ‘decontaminants’ can be used in the EU only if the European Commission authorises their use. The complainant, a producer of food decontaminants, asked the Commission to authorise its product. The Commission did not approve the request. Dissatisfied with this decision, the applicant turned to the Ombudsman. The Ombudsman found that the Commission had dealt properly with the complainant’s appli...

Summary of the decision in case 2104/2018/MH on how the European Commission dealt with concerns about the employment law applicable to cabin crew

Středa | 27 února 2019

The complainant is a Spanish trade union. European trade unions wrote to the European Commission calling on it to take appropriate action about their concerns relating to the failure of some Member States to apply local employment laws to cabin crew in the airline sector. The complainant turned to the Ombudsman because it was not satisfied with the Commission’s response. The Ombudsman found that t...

Decision in case 476/2018/EA on the information made available by the European Commission about an ‘expert group’ on defence research

Pátek | 22 února 2019

The case concerned the information made available by the European Commission about the As-If Programme Committee for Defence Research, which advises the Commission on defence research. The complainant contended that the information on the Commission’s register of ‘expert groups’ was not up-to-date. The Ombudsman found that the Commission had updated the register by adding the agendas and minutes o...

Summary of the decision in case 1830/2017/SRS on how the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) selects external experts to provide scientific advice

Pátek | 08 února 2019

This case concerned how the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) selected experts to take part in a working group, which drafted an opinion on the use of non-human primates in research. The complainant argued that the procedure to select the experts was not transparent and that the Commission had not ensured a plurality of views within ...

Summary of the decision of the European Ombudsman in case 2111/2017/MDC on the time taken by the European Commission to review the Cosmetics Regulation with regard to substances with endocrine-disrupting properties

Čtvrtek | 07 února 2019

The complaint concerned the time taken by the European Commission to complete a review of the EU regulation governing the safety of cosmetic products (Cosmetics Regulation). The complainant claimed that the Commission was taking too long to carry out the review to take account of substances with endocrine-disrupting properties. The review was finally completed in November 2018, more than two years...

Summary of the decision in case 268/2017/MH on how the European Commission dealt with an application to authorise formaldehyde as an additive to animal feed

Pondělí | 04 února 2019

The complaint concerned how the European Commission dealt with an application for formaldehyde to be authorised as an additive to animal feed. The complainant considered that the Commission had lacked objectivity, was politically-motivated and had not sufficiently taken into account scientific opinion in proposing to refuse the authorisation of formaldehyde. The complainant also considered that th...

Summary of the decisionin case 23/2018/SRS on how the European Commission updates EU rules on chemical testing when alternative test methods are identified

Středa | 30 ledna 2019

This case concerned how the European Commission deals with updates of the Test Method Regulation (TMR), which defines the approved methods for chemical testing in the EU. The Commission is obliged to update the regulation when it identifies a potential alternative test method to current testing on animals. The complainant is of the view that the TMR can be updated without the need for the test met...

Shrnutí rozhodnutí Evropské veřejné ochránkyně práv, kterým se uzavírá její strategické šetření OI/6/2017/EA týkající se způsobu, jakým Evropská komise zajišťuje přístup ke svým webovým stránkám osobám se zdravotním postižením

Čtvrtek | 20 prosince 2018

Veřejná ochránkyně práv prozkoumala, jak Evropská komise zajišťuje, aby její webové stránky a zpřístupněné on-line nástroje byly přístupné osobám se zdravotním postižením. Veřejná ochránkyně práv se dotázala Komise na používání přístupných formátů (jako je „snadno čitelný“ formát) a na to, jak umožňuje uživatelům poskytovat zpětnou vazbu ohledně přístupnosti a jak školí své pracovníky v otázkách p...

Shrnutí rozhodnutí ve věci 1747/2018/FP týkající se odepření ze strany Evropské komise poskytnout přístup k dokumentům týkajícím se legislativní změny

Středa | 28 listopadu 2018

Věc se týkala toho, že Evropská komise odepřela nevládní organizaci zabývající se ochranou práv zvířat veřejný přístup k dokumentům týkajícím se výpočtů provedených s cílem odhadnout rozsah využívání zvířat v rámci vypracování návrhu posouzení dopadů, který je připojen k návrhu nařízení o změně nařízení REACH. Komise odepřela přístup k dokumentům z toho důvodu, že zpřístupnění by vážně narušilo oc...