- EN English
Good Practice Guidelines regarding disclosure of the names of selection board members
Correspondence - Date Friday | 16 May 2014
Case OI/4/2013/CK - Opened on Monday | 12 August 2013 - Decision on Friday | 16 May 2014 - Institutions concerned EURATOM Supply Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Banking Authority ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Securities and Markets Authority ( No further inquiries justified ) | Community Plant Variety Office ( No further inquiries justified ) | Agency for Support for BEREC ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Asylum Support Office ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Border and Coast Guard Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Aviation Safety Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Chemicals Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Environment Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Food Safety Authority ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Institute for Gender Equality ( No further inquiries justified ) | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Maritime Safety Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Medicines Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Agency for Cybersecurity ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Agency for Railways ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Training Foundation ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Intellectual Property Office ( No further inquiries justified ) | Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Defence Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Institute for Security Studies ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Institute of Innovation and Technology ( No further inquiries justified ) | Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Research Council Executive Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Systemic Risk Board ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Education and Culture Executive Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation ( No further inquiries justified ) | European Research Executive Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) | Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency ( No further inquiries justified ) - Country France
Introduction
1. These Guidelines are issued by the European Ombudsman following an own-initiative inquiry into the different practices adopted by the EU Agencies regarding the issue of disclosure of the names of selection board members[1].
2. The objective of the Guidelines is to assist the EU Agencies to ensure the correct balance between (i) the needs of transparency, (ii) the legitimate requirements of confidentiality in the work of selection boards and (iii) the fundamental right to personal data protection.
3. In formulating the Guidelines, the Ombudsman took into consideration the following points:
(i) Appropriate transparency in the work of selection boards plays an important role in promoting citizens’ confidence in the integrity and objectivity of selection procedures and the absence of any conflict of interest.
(ii) The secrecy relating to the deliberations and proceedings of selection boards was introduced with a view to guaranteeing the independence of these boards and the objectivity of their proceedings, by protecting them from all external interference and pressure. Therefore, observance of this secrecy requirement precludes the disclosure of the views expressed by individual members of selection boards.
(iii) Keeping secret the views of individual selection board members is not, however, the same as keeping their identities secret. Whilst the former protects members of selection boards from external pressure, the latter risks creating a climate of mistrust, for example, by encouraging suspicions about possible conflicts of interest or even doubts about the competence and merits of the members. It is therefore necessary, in the public interest, to disclose the names of selection board members.
(iv) Disclosure of the names of the members of Selection Boards involves the processing of personal data by the EU Agency concerned, which must comply with Regulation 45/2001[2].
The Guidelines
Guideline 1 - Establishing a Proactive Policy
4. Good administration requires EU Agencies not only to deal correctly with requests for public access to documents and information, but also to decide, in a proactive manner, what information and documents to make available to the public[3].
5. The question of access to the names of selection board members arises quite often. In the interests of efficiency and consistency, each Agency should therefore establish a proactive practice regarding disclosure of names, rather than confine itself to responding to requests for access on a case-by case basis.
Guideline 2 - Schemes of Proactive Disclosure
6. While each EU Agency should decide on a scheme that best corresponds to its specific organisational circumstances, all such schemes should take account of the following points.
7. The practice of introducing members of the selection board by name at the beginning of the interview with candidates is a matter of courtesy rather than transparency. In fact such practice does not ensure adequate dissemination of information for the purposes of transparency, as it effectively excludes candidates who were not invited for an interview from knowing the identity of the selection board members.
8. It is good administrative practice to inform all candidates of the composition of the selection board by letter or by other appropriate means, such as information sheets, e-mails, e-recruitment messages. The information regarding the composition of the selection board should be provided to candidates in good time, for instance in the letter acknowledging receipt of their application, and at the latest together with the information regarding the outcome of their application.
9. Adequate publication of the composition of the selection board on a dedicated webpage on the Agency's website sufficiently in advance of interviews with candidates also constitutes good administrative practice, which should make it unnecessary to inform candidates individually.
Guideline 3 - Safeguarding the selection board's independence and the integrity and objectivity of selection procedures
10. EU Agencies should put in place appropriate procedures and safeguards in order to safeguard the independence of the members of the selection board and the integrity and objectivity of selection procedures. Such measures could include:
- establishing a clear policy on the prevention of conflicts of interest, and informing all selection board members of it,
- informing candidates that they are not allowed to contact personally members of selection boards, and that doing so constitutes grounds for disqualification from the procedure, and
- requiring selection board members immediately to report any attempt made by candidates or third parties to contact or influence them in relation to the competition.
Guideline 4 - Complying with EU personal data protection rules
11. In implementing a proactive policy regarding disclosure, EU agencies should respect the provisions of Regulation 45/2001 in order to safeguard the fundamental right to data protection. The proactive policy should explain the necessity for the processing of personal data involved, as described in these Guidelines, and the balance that the policy represents between the public interest in transparency and the fundamental right to data protection.
12. Members of selection boards should therefore be informed, prior to their appointment, that their names will be disclosed to candidates and that consent to such disclosure is a condition of appointment. In cases where a prospective member of a selection board objects to such disclosure, the invitation to sit in the selection board should be withdrawn.
13. In case of publication of the composition of the selection board on the Agency's website, members of the selection board should be informed that their names will be published on the Agency's website. They should also be informed of their right to object, on compelling legitimate grounds, to such publication. However, the attention of these members of the selection board should be drawn to the fact that their names will nevertheless be disclosed to candidates[4].
Emily O'Reilly
[1] OI/4/2013/CK. All the correspondence related to this own-initiative inquiry is available at:
http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/en/cases/initiatives.faces
[2] Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data, OJ 2001 L 8, p. 1.
[3] Agencies could usefully consult, on this and other points, the paper from the European Data Protection Supervisor of 24 March 2011, "Public access to documents containing personal data after the Bavarian Lager ruling", which is available on the website of the EDPS. <https://secure.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/EDPS/Publications/Papers/BackgroundP/11-03-24_Bavarian_Lager_EN.pdf>
[4] See points 8 and 12 above.