Gäller ditt klagomål en EU-institution eller ett EU-organ?
Sök efter undersökningar
Visar 1 – 20 av 199 resultat
Decision on how the European Parliament communicated with an applicant for a traineeship (case 1266/2022/LM)
Torsdag | 15 december 2022
The case concerned how the European Parliament communicated with an individual regarding his application for a traineeship. The complainant contended that he was shortlisted, interviewed and then rejected before the period for shortlisting candidates had formally started. He argued that this was in breach of the selection procedure rules.
The Ombudsman found that the Parliament had initially miscommunicated with the complainant, but that it promptly remedied this. The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration but encouraged the Parliament to improve the information provided on the dedicated webpage for the traineeship in question, notably about the possibility to interview candidates.
Entscheidung in der oben genannten Angelegenheit über die Entscheidung der Europäischen Exekutivagentur für Gesundheit und Digitales (HaDEA) bereits gebilligte Fördermittel nicht zu gewähren
Torsdag | 01 december 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with an infringement complaint against Poland concerning EU-funded survey works in south-eastern Poland and the Polish judicial system (case 1296/2022/ABZ)
Onsdag | 23 november 2022
Europaparlamentets beslut om att ändra typen av anställningsavtal för en konferenstolk
Fredag | 18 november 2022
Hur Europeiska gräns- och kustbevakningsbyrån (Frontex) hanterade ett klagomål om genomförandet av ett onlineprov för kontraktsanställda för anställning av specialister på internationellt samarbete ([TG IV]-RCT-2022-00024)
Torsdag | 20 oktober 2022
Hur Europaparlamentet kommunicerade med en person som sökte en praktiktjänst
Måndag | 19 september 2022
Hur Europeiska gräns- och kustbevakningsbyrån (Frontex) organiserade ett onlinetest för att rekrytera specialister inom internationellt samarbete ((TGIV) – RCT-2022–00024)
Tisdag | 13 september 2022
Decision concerning the rejection of the Research Executive Agency’s (REA) of an application for funding under the programme Horizon Europe and the European Commission’s rejection of the request for review (1553/2022/PL)
Torsdag | 08 september 2022
Hur Europeiska kommissionen (GD Konkurrens) hanterade ett klagomål om utlämnande av en ansökan om förmånlig behandling i Rumänien
Onsdag | 31 augusti 2022
Europeiska kommissionens sätt att hantera klagomål mot Polen när det gäller det EU-finansierade lantmäteriarbetet i sydöstra Polen och det polska rättsväsendet
Torsdag | 04 augusti 2022
Europeiska kommissionens underlåtenhet att svara på en skrivelse om ett EU-finansierat projekt i södra Spanien
Fredag | 29 juli 2022
Decision on how the European External Action Service (EEAS) dealt with concerns about the pre-selection of candidates for the Junior Professionals in Delegations programme (case 1537/2021/OAM)
Tisdag | 28 juni 2022
The case concerned how the European External Action Service’s handled a complaint concerning the pre-selection of candidates by Romania for the Junior Professionals in Delegations programme. The EEAS said that, according to the rules, it cannot review Member States’ assessments of candidates, unless there is a manifest error or substantiated allegations that the procedure was not fair, transparent and objective, which was not the case. The Ombudsman found the EEAS’s explanation of its role, as well as its assessment of this case, was reasonable.
The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry finding no maladministration.
Europeiska kommissionens underlåtenhet att bekräfta mottagandet av ett klagomål om projekt för återställande av kustområden i södra Spanien
Fredag | 08 april 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a complaint against the Spanish region of Aragón for its rules on the use of coal in heating installations (case 407/2022/PL)
Tisdag | 15 mars 2022
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) carried out a selection procedure for officers in its Standing Corps (case 56/2021/NH)
Fredag | 04 mars 2022
The case concerned the decision by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) not to select the complainant as an officer in its Standing Corps following an interview as part of a selection procedure. The complainant argued that his application had received unjustifiably low scores. In addition, the complainant was concerned that Frontex did not allow him to request a review of the decision.
The Ombudsman found that the selection board set up by Frontex had followed the vacancy notice when scoring the complainant’s application. Frontex confirmed that it had processed the complainant’s request for review, but acknowledged that the information provided to the complainant may not have been clear. In the course of the inquiry, Frontex implemented changes in its practices, which the Ombudsman welcomed.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by Frontex.
Hur kommissionen behandlade ett klagomål om en överträdelse av unionsrätten av Polen och andra medlemsstater
Fredag | 18 februari 2022
Europeiska kommissionens underlåtenhet att på lämpligt sätt svara på en begäran rörande EU:s digitala covidintyg
Tisdag | 11 januari 2022
Europeiska kommissionens underlåtenhet att hålla klaganden underrättad om läget i ett överträdelseklagomål avseende praktiktjänstgöring vid italienska domstolar
Onsdag | 15 december 2021
Europeiska kommissionens underlåtenhet att svara på ett överträdelseklagomål avseende Irlands påstådda överträdelse av den allmänna dataskyddsförordningen
Fredag | 03 december 2021
Decision concerning how the European Parliament Citizens' Inquiries Unit replied to a request concerning social security in Latvia (Complaint 1953/2021/LM)
Tisdag | 23 november 2021