Iskanje po preiskavah
Prikaz rezultatov 1–20 od 846
The European Commission’s delay in assessing and publishing several European Assessment Documents for steel products used in the construction sector
Torek | 30 maj 2023
How the European Commission dealt with an infringement complaint - CHAP(2022)01217, Finland, judicial dealing with a patent matter
Ponedeljek | 22 maj 2023
The European Commission’s failure to reply to a request for information about Spain’s alleged failure to comply with a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union
Ponedeljek | 22 maj 2023
The European Commission's failure to reply to an email concerning the alleged violation of the complainant's fundamental rights by Spain
Ponedeljek | 22 maj 2023
The failure of the European Commission to inform the complainant about its handling of an infringement complaint it submitted in July 2021
Torek | 16 maj 2023
EPSO's failure to reply to a request for review in selection procedure EPSO/AD/391/21-1 Experts in technical support to Member States' structural reforms (AD7)
Torek | 16 maj 2023
The time taken by the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) to decide on a complaint
Torek | 16 maj 2023
Decision on how the European Commission (Europe Direct) dealt with an information request about Europe Day 2023 (case 690/2023/RVK)
Ponedeljek | 08 maj 2023
The European Commission’s failure to keep the complainant informed on the state of play of an infringement complaint against Spain (CHAP(2021)1278)
Torek | 25 april 2023
The failure by the European Commission to reply to a request for public access to documents (reference: EASE 2022/7352)
Torek | 25 april 2023
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents related to EU environmental strategy and legislation
Torek | 04 april 2023
Decision on how the European Union Agency for Railways handled an application for a vacancy (case 1259/2022/LM)
Torek | 04 april 2023
The complainant applied for a vacancy at the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA). When he later asked the ERA for an update on the status of his application, the ERA replied that it had not received it. The complainant thus turned to the Ombudsman.
In the context of the Ombudsman’s inquiry, the ERA explained that, due to a technical error with its email system, it had not received the complainant’s application. However, it asked the selection committee to evaluate the application. The ERA also explained the measures it intends to take to prevent similar incidents in future. The Ombudsman concluded that no further inquiries were justified.
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on its refusal to give public access to documents related to EU environmental strategy and legislation
Ponedeljek | 27 marec 2023
How the European Parliament dealt with a request for public access to a 'four-column document' relating to trilogue negotiations on the EU Digital Markets Act
Sreda | 22 marec 2023
Kako je Evropski parlament obravnaval zahtevo za dostop javnosti do dokumenta v štirih stolpcih v zvezi s tristranskimi pogajanji o aktu EU o digitalnih trgih
Ponedeljek | 20 marec 2023
Evropski bančni organ (EBA) domnevno ni odgovoril na zahtevo po informacijah o tem, kako obravnavati nekatera vprašanja bančnih nakazil in dedovanja
Petek | 17 marec 2023
Čas, ki ga je Evropska komisija potrebovala za zaključek preiskave kršitev v zvezi z lovom na volkove na Švedskem
Sreda | 15 marec 2023