Iskanje po preiskavah
Prikaz rezultatov 1–20 od 97
Decision on the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) decision not to allow a candidate in COVID-19 quarantine to reschedule a test (case 2223/2021/ABZ)
Sreda | 18 januar 2023
The case concerned the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to allow a candidate, who was placed in COVID-19 quarantine, to reschedule her test in the context of a selection procedure for contract agent staff (CAST Permanent selection procedure).
The Ombudsman found that EPSO provided reasonable explanations as to why it was not able to provide an alternative testing date to the complainant. On that basis, the Ombudsman closed the inquiry with a finding that there was no maladministration by EPSO.
Kako Evropska komisija zagotavlja, da so merila za upravičenost do sodelovanja v misijah EU za opazovanje volitev nediskriminatorna in pregledna
Ponedeljek | 21 november 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a request to extend the deadline for a retired staff member to request the ‘resettlement allowance’ (complaint 1428/2021/FA)
Ponedeljek | 07 november 2022
The case concerns the European Commission‘s refusal to extend the time limit for a retired staff member to request the resettlement allowance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The complainant argued that due to the outbreak of the pandemic, she was not able to organise her resettlement to her place of origin within the prescribed time limit and asked the Commission to grant her an extension.
The Ombudsman found that the decision of the Commission is in line with the Staff Regulations and EU case-law. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in the case 1484/2022/LDS on how the European Union Aviation Safety Agency handled a complaint concerning its advice on the impact of the war in Ukraine for private aviation
Petek | 02 september 2022
Komisija (delegacija EU v Džakarti) zavrnila plačilo na podlagi sporazuma o dodelitvi nepovratnih sredstev v okviru projekta EU Share
Petek | 15 julij 2022
Odločitev Evropske komisije o izterjavi sredstev EU, dodeljenih na podlagi pogodbe o zagotavljanju tehnične pomoči v tretji državi
Petek | 01 julij 2022
Torek | 21 junij 2022
Closing note on the Strategic Initiative concerning the impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU (SI/3/2021/VS)
Petek | 17 junij 2022
Četrtek | 02 junij 2022
Sodišče ni odgovorilo na vse trditve v zvezi s svojimi zahtevami v postopkih izbire samostojnih prevajalcev za prevajanje v nemščino
Petek | 08 april 2022
Report on the meeting between European Ombudsman representatives and European Data Protection Supervisor representatives
Četrtek | 31 marec 2022
Odločitev Evropskega urada za izbor osebja (EPSO), da kandidatu, ki mu je bila odrejena karantena zaradi covida-19, ne dovoli spremeniti datuma opravljanja preizkusa
Četrtek | 03 marec 2022
Petek | 19 november 2021
Decision concerning the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) rejecting as ineligible certain costs in the context of an EU-funded project (case 341/2021/LM)
Ponedeljek | 28 junij 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Data Protection Supervisor on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Petek | 18 junij 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Petek | 18 junij 2021
Petek | 18 junij 2021
Decision in case 964/2020/JN on how the European Commission evaluated a tender in a public procurement procedure for the translation of a report on the judicial reform in Cyprus
Torek | 11 maj 2021
The case concerned the European Commission´s decision to reject a tender in a public procurement procedure for the translation of a report on the judicial reform in Cyprus. The complainant considered that the Commission had been wrong in rejecting his tender because it considered he did not meet the specifications for the required experience. In the complainant’s view, the Commission should have asked him for clarifications.
The Ombudsman found that the Commission acted reasonably, and closed the inquiry finding no maladministration. She trusts that, going forward, the Commission will ensure that unsuccessful tenderers receive an adequate explanation of the reasons why their tender has been rejected, without having to ask for clarification.
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 428/2021/JN on how the European Commission handled correspondence with an Irish farmer concerning the Single Farm Payment scheme
Četrtek | 08 april 2021
How the European Commission and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) set up the EU Database for Information on Substances of Concern In Articles (SCIP database)
Ponedeljek | 07 december 2020