Wyświetla 1 - 20 z 260 wyników
Decision on how the European Commission takes into account work experience in staff selection procedures (case 1124/2021/LM)
Czwartek | 29 lipca 2021
Poniedziałek | 26 lipca 2021
The European Medicines Agency’s failure to respond to a complaint concerning its advice against the use of ivermectin as a medicine for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19
Wtorek | 20 lipca 2021
Poniedziałek | 19 lipca 2021
How the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) addressed concerns about language discrimination in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of international cooperation
Wtorek | 13 lipca 2021
Concerns about the European Investment Bank possessing sensitive personal data of job applicants prior to job interviews
Poniedziałek | 12 lipca 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Investment Bank (EIB) on its practice of requesting sensitive personal data from job applicants in the context of recruitment procedures
Czwartek | 08 lipca 2021
How the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
Poniedziałek | 05 lipca 2021
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (joint cases 1242/2020/SF and 1380/2020/SF)
Czwartek | 01 lipca 2021
The complaints concerned the European Commission’s decision not to extend funding for those carrying out research under the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Programme (MSCA) following the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers. The complainants considered that the measures the Commission put in place to support MSCA researchers during the COVID-19 crisis were insufficient, as they would not enable them to continue their work.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry into how the Commission communicated with project partners that received grants under the MSCA, and the researchers carrying out the work for those project partners, about the measures they could take to address the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on their projects.
During the inquiry, the Ombudsman shared her preliminary findings with the Commission. In particular, the inquiry showed that, overall, the Commission had taken appropriate action to communicate the measures that could be taken to support researchers according to the applicable rules. However, as no solution had been found for the complainants, she urged the Commission to explore whether additional funding could exceptionally be awarded to the complainants and researchers in similarly difficult situations.
The Commission broadly accepted the Ombudsman’s preliminary findings but reiterated that, due to legal and financial constraints, it cannot provide any exceptional funding.
The Ombudsman appreciates the difficult situation faced by many MSCA researchers due to the COVID-19 crisis. At the same time, she acknowledges the Commission’s commitment to find solutions within the applicable rules for those researchers impacted. While it is regrettable that a solution could not be found for the complainants and researchers in similar situations, the Ombudsman closed the case as further inquiries would not result in a more satisfactory outcome for the complainants. However, she made two suggestions for improvement.
Decision on how the European External Action Service (EEAS) handled e-mails about an EU citizen’s personal situation in Switzerland (case 1011/2021/ABZ)
Wtorek | 29 czerwca 2021
Brak poinformowania skarżącego przez Komisję o stanie postępowania w sprawie uchybienia zobowiązaniom państwa członkowskiego CHAP(2017)01280, austriacka ustawa dotycząca stypendiów studenckich
Poniedziałek | 28 czerwca 2021
Obawy dotyczące posiadania przez Europejski Bank Inwestycyjny wrażliwych danych osobowych kandydatów na stanowiska przed rozmowami kwalifikacyjnymi
Poniedziałek | 21 czerwca 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 981/2021//DL on how the European Commission replied to a request for information concerning the digital COVID-19 certificates
Piątek | 11 czerwca 2021
Sposób, w jaki Komisja Europejska przeprowadziła proces prowadzący do zmiany polisy ubezpieczenia chorobowego i wypadkowego dla Pomocniczych Tłumaczy Konferencyjnych
Piątek | 04 czerwca 2021
Decision in case 380/2020/VB on alleged irregularities in the selection procedure for the European prosecutor of one EU Member State
Środa | 28 kwietnia 2021
The case concerned the selection procedure for appointing a European prosecutor, part of the ‘College’ of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). The complainant is an unsuccessful candidate, who considered that there were irregularities in the selection procedure and the ad hoc ‘selection panel’s’ opinion to exclude his candidature for the position. In addition, the complainant did not receive a reply to concerns he raised.
In the course of the inquiry, the Ombudsman’s inquiry team took the view that there was a lack of clarity around possible review procedures and made a proposal for a solution and a suggestion for improvement to the Council of the EU. The Council rejected the proposals.
The selection procedure for the posts of European prosecutors lacks any mechanism providing for acts or omissions of the selection panel to be reviewed. There is clearly an accountability vacuum and the Council has missed an opportunity to enhance public trust in and the legitimacy of the selection procedure for these important posts. The solution proposal and suggestion for improvement would have helped address these shortcomings.
As the selection panel is not an EU body, which can be subject to an inquiry of the Ombudsman, and both the Council and Commission have refused to take responsibility for the actions of the panel, the Ombudsman considers that no further inquiries are justified and closes the case.
Decision in case 1015/2020/MMO against the European Commission for not inviting a person with disabilities for an interview
Środa | 21 kwietnia 2021
The case concerned the fact that the European Commission never invited the complainant, a person with a disability, for an interview although he had passed an EU staff selection procedure in the field of food safety and had been included on a shortlist from which successful candidates may be recruited. The complainant argued that he had been discriminated against because of his disability.
The Ombudsman found no indication that the Commission had discriminated against the complainant. In view of this, and given that the shortlist of successful candidates in which the complainant was included is no longer valid, the Ombudsman concluded that no further inquiries into the complaint were justified.
Nieudzielenie przez Komisję Europejską odpowiedzi na pytania dotyczące tego, w jaki sposób uwzględnia ona w procedurach naboru doświadczenie zdobyte przez kandydatów przed uzyskaniem dyplomu
Środa | 21 kwietnia 2021
Sposób w jaki Europejski Urząd Doboru Kadr (EPSO) dokonał oceny doświadczenia kandydata w procedurze naboru na pracownika UE w dziedzinie współpracy międzynarodowej
Wtorek | 09 marca 2021
Odrzucenie przez Wspólnotowy Urząd Ochrony Odmian Roślin wniosku o udział w procedurze naboru pracowników na kierownika działu IT
Czwartek | 25 lutego 2021
EPSO and alleged discrimination as concerns the languages in which candidates can do the talent screener test - EPSO/AD/380/19 (AD 7)
Wtorek | 23 lutego 2021