Szukaj dochodzeń
Wyświetla 1 - 20 z 157 wyników
Sposób, w jaki Europejska Agencja Wykonawcza ds. Badań Naukowych oceniła zdolność finansową przedsiębiorstwa ubiegającego się o udział w projekcie finansowanym przez UE w ramach programu „Horyzont Europa”
Czwartek | 22 września 2022
Decision concerning the rejection of the Research Executive Agency’s (REA) of an application for funding under the programme Horizon Europe and the European Commission’s rejection of the request for review (1553/2022/PL)
Czwartek | 08 września 2022
The European Commission’s refusal to give public access to a document concerning a mineral exploration research project that received EU funds under the Horizon 2020 programme
Środa | 17 sierpnia 2022
The European Commission’s refusal to give public access to documents concerning a mineral exploration research project that received EU funds under the Horizon 2020 programme
Piątek | 22 lipca 2022
Brak udzielenia przez Komisję Europejską odpowiedzi na e-maile dotyczące jakości powietrza w kabinie samolotu pasażerskiego
Piątek | 17 czerwca 2022
Odmowa udzielenia przez Komisję Europejską publicznego dostępu do dokumentu dotyczącego projektu badawczego poszukiwania minerałów w ramach programu „Horyzont 2020”
Piątek | 22 lipca 2022
Sposób w jaki Komisja Europejska rozpatrzyła obawy dotyczące europejskiej sieci referencyjnej dla zespołu Pierre’a Robina
Środa | 01 czerwca 2022
Rozwiązanie przez Agencję Wykonawczą Europejskiej Rady ds. Innowacji i ds. MŚP (EISMEA) umowy o udzielenie dotacji, ponieważ beneficjent dotacji utracił status MŚP
Czwartek | 24 marca 2022
Nieudzielenie przez Europejski Urząd ds. Zwalczania Nadużyć Finansowych (OLAF) odpowiedzi na skargę dotyczącą domniemanej kradzieży własności intelektualnej
Piątek | 10 grudnia 2021
Nieudzielenie przez Komisję Europejską odpowiedzi na korespondencję dotyczącą zmniejszenia budżetu na umowę o udzielenie dotacji
Środa | 01 grudnia 2021
Zarzut braku odpowiedzi Komisji na pismo dotyczące europejskiej sieci referencyjnej dla zespołu Pierre’a Robina
Czwartek | 09 września 2021
Decision in case 1046/2021/LM on how the European Commission handled a request for review of the Research Executive Agency’s assessment of a project proposal under Horizon 2020
Wtorek | 27 lipca 2021
How the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
Poniedziałek | 05 lipca 2021
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (joint cases 1242/2020/SF and 1380/2020/SF)
Czwartek | 01 lipca 2021
The complaints concerned the European Commission’s decision not to extend funding for those carrying out research under the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Programme (MSCA) following the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers. The complainants considered that the measures the Commission put in place to support MSCA researchers during the COVID-19 crisis were insufficient, as they would not enable them to continue their work.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry into how the Commission communicated with project partners that received grants under the MSCA, and the researchers carrying out the work for those project partners, about the measures they could take to address the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on their projects.
During the inquiry, the Ombudsman shared her preliminary findings with the Commission. In particular, the inquiry showed that, overall, the Commission had taken appropriate action to communicate the measures that could be taken to support researchers according to the applicable rules. However, as no solution had been found for the complainants, she urged the Commission to explore whether additional funding could exceptionally be awarded to the complainants and researchers in similarly difficult situations.
The Commission broadly accepted the Ombudsman’s preliminary findings but reiterated that, due to legal and financial constraints, it cannot provide any exceptional funding.
The Ombudsman appreciates the difficult situation faced by many MSCA researchers due to the COVID-19 crisis. At the same time, she acknowledges the Commission’s commitment to find solutions within the applicable rules for those researchers impacted. While it is regrettable that a solution could not be found for the complainants and researchers in similar situations, the Ombudsman closed the case as further inquiries would not result in a more satisfactory outcome for the complainants. However, she made two suggestions for improvement.
How the European Border and Coast Guard (Frontex) dealt with multiple requests for public access to documents concerning contracts with private companies
Piątek | 18 czerwca 2021
Decision in case 2067/2020/MIG on the European Border and Coast Guard Agency’s (Frontex) handling of multiple requests for public access to documents made by a single applicant
Środa | 16 czerwca 2021
The case concerned how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) handled multiple requests for public access to documents made by a single applicant. Frontex considered that the scope of the complainant’s multiple requests, which had been made in close temporal proximity, was too extensive to be processed in parallel. It therefore proposed, as a fair solution, to put them in a queue and process them in turn. The complainant did not agree to this approach.
The Ombudsman noted that it was not clear how extensive the scope of the complainant’s requests was and how much work it would entail to assess whether the documents concerned can be released. She proposed that Frontex should immediately recommence processing the complainant’s access requests, beginning with the most urgent one, as indicated by the complainant during the inquiry. She also proposed that Frontex provide the complainant with a list of all documents at issue to enable him to determine the priority of each request.
Frontex accepted the Ombudsman’s proposal and provided the complainant with a reply to the indicated access request shortly thereafter.
The Ombudsman welcomed Frontex’s response to her proposal for a solution and closed the case, calling on Frontex to make every effort to ensure that the complainant’s access requests are now dealt with quickly. The Ombudsman also encourages Frontex, in an effort to avoid delays, to improve its communication with applicants when attempting to find a fair solution on how to process extensive requests.
Proposal of the European Ombudsman for a solution in case 2067/2020/MIG on the European Border and Coast Guard Agency’s (Frontex) handling of multiple requests for public access to documents made by a single applicant
Wtorek | 20 kwietnia 2021
Nieudzielenie przez Europejską Agencję Leków (EMA) odpowiedzi na wniosek o publiczny dostęp do dokumentów
Środa | 14 kwietnia 2021