You have a complaint against an EU institution or body?

Available languages:
  • ENEnglish

The European Anti-Fraud Office’s handling of a “coordination case”

Allegation(s)

1) OLAF wrongly decided to refuse access to some of the documents requested by the complainant.

2) OLAF failed to hear the complainants in the framework of its investigation.

3) OLAF failed to consider the material exonerating the complainants, and only based its report on evidence burdening them, thus lacking objectivity in its handling of the case.

4) OLAF failed to reply to the complainants' questions raised in their letter of 28 August 2013.

Claim(s)

1) OLAF should disclose the documents requested by the complainant.

2) OLAF should hear the complainants in the framework of its investigation.

3) OLAF should consider the material exonerating the complainants.

4) OLAF should reply to the complainants' questions.