Wilt u een klacht indienen tegen een instelling of orgaan van de EU?
Onderzoeken doorzoeken
1 - 20 van 390 resultaten weergeven
Decision on how the European Parliament took into account technical problems in a selection procedure for intercultural and language professionals (case 718/2022/PL)
Vrijdag | 01 juli 2022
The impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU
Dinsdag | 21 juni 2022
Decision on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of international cooperation (case 270/2021/KT)
Maandag | 20 juni 2022
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of international cooperation.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications and, therefore, closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Closing note on the Strategic Initiative concerning the impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU (SI/3/2021/VS)
Vrijdag | 17 juni 2022
How the European Commission took into account the COVID-19 pandemic on a staff member
Donderdag | 02 juni 2022
Decision 1222/2021/TM on how the European Commission evaluated a grant application on the topic of media freedom and investigative journalism
Donderdag | 05 mei 2022
Betaling door de Commissie (PMO) van de toelagen voor een kind aan slechts één van de ouders, terwijl beide ouders het ouderlijk gezag hebben
Dinsdag | 12 april 2022
Beoordeling door het Asielagentschap van de Europese Unie (EUAA) van de beroepservaring van een kandidaat in een selectieprocedure voor externe deskundigen (EASO/2021/885)
Dinsdag | 12 april 2022
Beoordeling door het Asielagentschap van de Europese Unie (EUAA) van de beroepservaring van een kandidaat in een selectieprocedure voor externe deskundigen (EASO/2021/885)
Dinsdag | 12 april 2022
Verzuim van de EDEO (Europese Dienst voor extern optreden) om te antwoorden op e-mails over de stopzetting van de werkzaamheden van de indiener van een klacht
Vrijdag | 01 april 2022
Report on the meeting between European Ombudsman representatives and European Data Protection Supervisor representatives
Donderdag | 31 maart 2022
De manier waarop de Europese Dienst voor extern optreden (EDEO) een verzoek van een externe deskundige om te telewerken vanwege COVID-19-beperkingen heeft behandeld
Maandag | 07 maart 2022
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) carried out a selection procedure for officers in its Standing Corps (case 56/2021/NH)
Vrijdag | 04 maart 2022
The case concerned the decision by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) not to select the complainant as an officer in its Standing Corps following an interview as part of a selection procedure. The complainant argued that his application had received unjustifiably low scores. In addition, the complainant was concerned that Frontex did not allow him to request a review of the decision.
The Ombudsman found that the selection board set up by Frontex had followed the vacancy notice when scoring the complainant’s application. Frontex confirmed that it had processed the complainant’s request for review, but acknowledged that the information provided to the complainant may not have been clear. In the course of the inquiry, Frontex implemented changes in its practices, which the Ombudsman welcomed.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by Frontex.
Decision on the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency’s (GSA) rejection of a submission in a contest to design a logo (case 423/2021/OAM)
Donderdag | 03 maart 2022
The European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency (GSA) rejected the complainant’s submission in a contest to design a logo because there was a technical problem with the submission.
The Ombudsman’s view is that the GSA should have dealt with the matter differently and in accordance with the standards that citizens are entitled to expect from the EU administration. It should also have communicated in a more consistent and timely way with the complainant about the technical problem. However, as the contest procedure has now ended, the Ombudsman considered that further inquiries in this case are not justified.
Onjuiste informatie over de status van een kandidaat op de CAST-lijst voor de selectie van arbeidscontractanten die door het Europees Bureau voor personeelsselectie (EPSO) wordt beheerd
Woensdag | 16 februari 2022
Decision on how the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) handled a recruitment procedure (complaint: 1388/2021/JN)
Woensdag | 09 februari 2022