Wilt u een klacht indienen tegen een instelling of orgaan van de EU?
Onderzoeken doorzoeken
1 - 20 van 449 resultaten weergeven
Decision on how the European Commission handled an infringement complaint concerning the refusal by Spain to recognise a surname (CHAP(2020)3496) (case 783/2023/PGP)
Dinsdag | 23 mei 2023
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) recruited candidates from a reserve list to its standing corps (case 277/2022/FA)
Woensdag | 17 mei 2023
The case concerned how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) recruited members of its standing corps from a ‘reserve list’ established in the context of a selection procedure. The complainant took issue with Frontex’s decision to recruit some candidates before the completion of the selection procedure, and with the fact that some candidates on the reserve list were recruited to different types of posts to those set out in the selection notice.
The Ombudsman found issues in how Frontex organised the selection procedure. She proposed that Frontex extend the validity of the reserve list for at least one year and inform all candidates that took part in the selection procedure of the issues faced and the changes applied to the terms of the selection procedure. In its reply to the Ombudsman, Frontex did not address the solution proposed and merely explained the steps taken in its recruitment plan. The Ombudsman understands Frontex’s reply as an implicit rejection of the solution proposed.
The Ombudsman found maladministration in Frontex’s failure to comply with the provisions of the selection notice and to inform all candidates of the changes in the conditions of the selection procedure. As the validity of the reserve list has since expired, no purpose would be served by making a recommendation. The Ombudsman therefore closed the case, pointing out that a finding that an EU body has failed to comply with a selection notice is, for her Office, rare and serious. Moreover, in the course of this inquiry, the Ombudsman gave Frontex the possibility to address the concerns raised on three different occasions. Frontex provided limited and unsatisfactory replies. She will emphasise this in her letter to the new Executive Director about this case. The Ombudsman also set out suggestions to Frontex for the future.
Decision on how the European Commission replied to emails saying that Austria had violated fundamental rights (case 660/2023/NK)
Donderdag | 11 mei 2023
Decision on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the application of a candidate in a selection procedure for secretaries (case 941/2022/VS)
Vrijdag | 28 april 2023
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s decision not to admit the complainant to a selection procedure for secretaries due to insufficient professional experience in the field of the competition.
The Ombudsman found that the selection board had examined the information provided in the complainant’s application and assessed it against the eligibility criteria. The Ombudsman did not identify a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the application, and closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
How the secretariat of the EU Transparency Register assessed the information provided by two entities on the register concerning their links to the food industry
Donderdag | 27 april 2023
Decision on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the application of a candidate in a selection procedure for administrators in the field of sustainable agriculture and rural development (case 576/2022/VS)
Woensdag | 26 april 2023
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of sustainable agriculture and rural development.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the complainant’s professional experience and, therefore, closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
How the secretariat of the EU Transparency Register assessed the information provided by two entities on the register concerning their links to the food industry
Dinsdag | 25 april 2023
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with complaints that Spain is in breach of EU law concerning fixed-term employment contracts (case 1813/2022/PGP)
Donderdag | 20 april 2023
The case concerned information provided by the European Commission about the status of two infringement complaints.
The Ombudsman found that the Commission could have provided more comprehensive information about the status of one of the complaints, notably in relation to the ongoing ‘multiple complaints procedure’ covering some of the issues raised in that complaint. However, it dealt with the complaints in a reasonable manner.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision on how the European Commission handled an infringement complaint concerning the implementation of the Animal Breeding Regulation in Ireland (CHAP(2022)00801) (case 480/2023/PGP)
Maandag | 03 april 2023
Manier waarop de Europese Commissie e-mails over een mogelijke inbreuk door Spanje van de EU-regels inzake liften heeft beantwoord
Donderdag | 30 maart 2023
Manier waarop het Vertaalbureau voor de organen van de Europese Unie een offerte heeft beoordeeld die was ingediend naar aanleiding van een aanbesteding op het gebied van vertaal- en redactionele diensten
Woensdag | 29 maart 2023
Decision on how the European Commission handled an infringement complaint (CHAP(2022)00800) concerning the implementation of the Animal Breeding Regulation in Ireland (case 351/2023/JN)
Woensdag | 15 maart 2023
Decision on how the European Commission handled an infringement complaint concerning Danish rules on temporary use of cars from other Member States (case 1245/2020/PB)
Dinsdag | 21 februari 2023
The complainant in this case contended that the European Commission had not fully examined an infringement complaint concerning Danish rules on temporary use of cars from other EU Member States. The complainant suspected that the Danish rules in this area are to some extent intended to minimise the temporary use of cars registered in other Member States, with a view to increasing revenues from the registration of imported cars.
The Ombudsman found that the issue raised by the complainant warranted further attention, and that certain specific points had not been fully addressed by the Commission. She therefore proposed as a solution that the Commission register and examine the infringement complaint anew. The Commission accepted her proposal and the Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry.
Decision on the above complaint against the European Commission concerning its reply to a letter concerning an infringement by Italy of the European Account Preservation Order procedure
Donderdag | 16 februari 2023
Antwoord van de Europese Commissie op een brief over vermeende schendingen van de EU-grondrechten door Oostenrijk
Maandag | 06 februari 2023
How the European Commission responded to concerns that it collects insufficient information about Ireland's implementation of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Maandag | 30 januari 2023
Decision on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the application of a candidate in a selection procedure for administrators in the field of agriculture (case 381/2022/FA)
Maandag | 30 januari 2023
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the education and professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of agriculture.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications and, therefore, closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in the above case on the Commission’s reply to a letter concerning an alleged infringement of anti-discrimination rules by Germany (case 2272/2022/NK)
Maandag | 16 januari 2023