Vai vēlaties iesniegt sūdzību par ES iestādi vai struktūru?
Meklēt izmeklēšanas
Rādīt 1 - 20 no 568 rezultātiem
Decision in case 183/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research
Piektdiena | 20 novembris 2020
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in case 194/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research
Piektdiena | 20 novembris 2020
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in case 211/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of scientific research
Piektdiena | 20 novembris 2020
The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) assessment of the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU civil servants in the field of scientific research (scientific knowledge management and communication).
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Le refus de l´OLAF de donner accès à un rapport final d’enquête à la personne concernée par l’enquête en question
Ceturtdiena | 19 novembris 2020
Decision in case 1991/2019/KR on the European Commission’s action concerning sustainability assessment for gas projects on the current List of Projects of Common Interest
Otrdiena | 17 novembris 2020
The case concerned the inclusion of gas projects on the EU’s 2019 list of Projects of Common Interest (PCIs).These are cross-border energy infrastructure projects that should help achieve EU energy and climate policy objectives. The complainant was concerned that the sustainability of gas projects on that PCI list had not been satisfactorily assessed, as is required.
The Commission had already acknowledged that the sustainability assessment of candidate gas projects had been suboptimal due to a lack of data and inadequate methodologies. In the course of the inquiry, the Commission informed the Ombudsman that it is updating the criterion used for assessing the sustainability of projects that are candidates for inclusion on the next PCI list, which it will draw up in 2021.
Among other things, this update is expected to take into account the CO2 and methane balance, as well as efficiency impacts, in the assessment of projects. The indicator is expected to reflect the infrastructure’s expected impact on the overall greenhouse gas intensity of energy production in a given EU Member State and the emissions related to the functioning of the infrastructure itself.
The Ombudsman welcomes the fact that the Commission will ensure that this update is in place before the decision is taken on the next PCI list. The adoption date for the next PCI list is foreseen in the last quarter of 2021.
Given the EU’s objectives concerning climate change and sustainability, it is regrettable that gas projects were included on previous PCI lists, without having their sustainability properly assessed. This meant that it was not possible to rank them to identify the most sustainable ones. However, the Commission is taking the necessary action with the result that no further inquiries of the Ombudsman are justified at this point.
Decision in case 576/2020/DDJ on how the European Personnel Selection Office assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for recruiting conference operators to the EU civil service
Otrdiena | 10 novembris 2020
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting conference operators to the EU civil service.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Reply from the European Commission to the European Ombudsman concerning the European Commission's failure to finalise an updated Sustainability Impact Assessment before concluding the Mercosur-EU trade negotiations
Otrdiena | 27 oktobris 2020
Decision of the European Ombudsman in case 674/2020/KT on how the EU Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol) dealt with a procurement procedure for staff accommodation in Greece
Piektdiena | 23 oktobris 2020
Follow -up reply from the European Commission concerning the Preliminary findings of the European Ombudsman in the joint cases 1570/2018/JF-JN and 1973/2018/JF-JN on how the European Commission approves substances used in plant protection products (pesticides)
Ceturtdiena | 22 oktobris 2020
How the European Commission dealt with concerns raised about the research and development information related to active substances in pesticides that it approves
Trešdiena | 21 oktobris 2020
Decision of the European Ombudsman on the European Commission's failure to answer correspondence concerning the interpretation of the data protection periods under the Pesticides Regulation (Regulation 1107/2009)
Pirmdiena | 19 oktobris 2020
Decision in case 1468/2020/SF on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) dealt with complaints about points awarded to a candidate in the field-related interview in a selection procedure for armed security officers
Ceturtdiena | 15 oktobris 2020
The European Border and Coast Guard Agency’s (Frontex) public register of documents
Piektdiena | 09 oktobris 2020
The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation’s (Europol) public register of documents
Piektdiena | 09 oktobris 2020
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 171/2020/KT on how the European Commission dealt with a complaint that Denmark had breached EU environmental law (Habitats Directive)
Otrdiena | 06 oktobris 2020
Reply from the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations (APPF) to the European Ombudsman's inquiry into the APPF's alleged failure to comply with transparency obligations
Pirmdiena | 05 oktobris 2020
The refusal by the European Union Intellectual Property Office to reimburse the fee of a successful appeal against a decision not to register a trade mark.
Pirmdiena | 05 oktobris 2020
Decision in case 2218/2019/MDC on the Research Executive Agency’s decision to consider ineligible certain costs claimed by a partner in an EU-funded project on the interoperability of unmanned vehicles (DARIUS)
Trešdiena | 16 septembris 2020
The case concerned the decision of the Research Executive Agency (REA) to consider ineligible certain costs claimed in the context of a project that was co-funded by the EU: the DARIUS project on the interoperability of unmanned vehicles in search and rescue operations.
The complainant considered that the REA had acted in a contradictory and inconsistent manner, and should not have deemed the costs ineligible. It raised various concerns about the findings of the audit on which that decision was based .
The Ombudsman found that the REA acted reasonably and in line with the grant agreement. She therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
The European Commission’s decision not to reopen a case concerning the application of Directive 2006/42 on machinery by Slovenia
Trešdiena | 02 septembris 2020