Vuoi presentare una denuncia contro un’istituzione o un organismo dell’UE?

Cerca indagini

Ricerca testo

Tipo di Documento

Istituzione coinvolta

Tipo di accordo

Numero del caso

Lingua

Data

Parole chiavi

Comunicazione

Oppure prova vecchie parole chiave (prima del 2016)

Visualizzazione 1 - 20 di 63 risultati

Decision in case 1498/2019/NH on the European Parliament not sending its reply to an access to documents request by e-mail

Giovedì | 28 maggio 2020

The case concerned the refusal by the European Parliament to send a decision refusing public access to documents by e-mail.

The Ombudsman found that Parliament’s reply to the complainant was reasonable in the given context, as the complainant had already received the decision by registered post.

The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there had been no maladministration by Parliament in this case.

Decisione nel caso 1484/2019/UNK sulla gestione da parte della Commissione europea di una richiesta di pieno accesso del pubblico ai progetti di un articolo in merito alla direttiva sul diritto d’autore pubblicato sul sito web della Commissione

Lunedì | 02 dicembre 2019

Il caso riguardava la decisione della Commissione europea di cancellare i nomi dei membri del personale della Commissione da un documento prima di concedere al denunciante l’accesso del pubblico allo stesso.

La Mediatrice ha ritenuto giustificata la decisione della Commissione di cancellare i nomi. Di conseguenza, ha archiviato l’indagine constatando l’assenza di cattiva amministrazione.

Decisione nel caso 552/2018/MIG sul rifiuto da parte della Commissione europea di consentire l’accesso del pubblico ai documenti concernenti la legge tedesca sull’applicazione del diritto nei social network

Mercoledì | 20 novembre 2019

Il caso riguardava una richiesta di accesso del pubblico a documenti detenuti dalla Commissione europea concernenti la legge tedesca sull’applicazione del diritto nei social network, volta a contrastare la diffusione di notizie false sui siti di socializzazione in rete.

La Mediatrice ha proposto una soluzione, invitando la Commissione a riconsiderare il suo rifiuto (parziale) di concedere l’accesso del pubblico ai documenti in questione. La Commissione non ha risposto entro il termine stabilito dalla Mediatrice, la quale ha pertanto formulato una raccomandazione alla Commissione.

La Commissione ha risposto di non accettare la raccomandazione della Mediatrice.

La Mediatrice si rammarica del fatto che la Commissione non abbia dato seguito alla sua raccomandazione e ha confermato il suo riscontro di cattiva amministrazione.

Decision in case 1731/2018/FP on the refusal by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency to grant public access to the documents submitted by a public undertaking for a funding approval in the context of a call for proposals by the Connecting Europe Facility

Venerdì | 04 ottobre 2019

The case concerned the refusal by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) to grant public access to documents submitted by a national cybersecurity authority that was seeking funding from INEA.

The Ombudsman inquired into the issue and proposed that INEA should partially disclose the requested documents, redacting only information that it considers to be genuinely commercially sensitive or personal data.

INEA rejected the Ombudsman’s proposal, arguing that most of the information that could be disclosed was already in the public domain and the proposed partial disclosure would impose a disproportionate administrative burden on INEA. It also said that it accepted the arguments of the national cybersecurity authority regarding the likely damage disclosure would cause to its commercial interests.

The Ombudsman found INEA’s refusal to grant even partial access to the requested documents to be maladministration and recommended that INEA partially disclose the relevant Grant application.

INEA rejected the Ombudsman’s recommendation. Consequently, the Ombudsman now closes the case, confirming her finding of maladministration.

Recommendation of the European Ombudsman in case 552/2018/MIG on the European Commission’s refusal of public access to documents concerning the German Network Enforcement Act

Martedì | 11 giugno 2019

The case concerned a refusal by the Commission, in 2017, to give a Member of the European Parliament public access to Commission documents regarding a new German social media law. The complainant considered that the Commission had failed to identify all the documents falling within the scope of her request. Regarding those documents it did identify, she considered that the Commission had wrongly redacted the documents.

The Ombudsman found that the Commission had failed to identify all the documents falling within the scope of the complainant’s request. She also found that the redactions made by the Commission were excessive. She thus proposed that the Commission reassess the scope of the request and reconsider its decision to (partially) deny access to the identified documents.

The Commission did not follow this solution proposal. As the Ombudsman considers the Commission’s handling of the complainant’s access request to constitute maladministration, she makes a corresponding recommendation and expresses her concern at the inordinate length of time the Commission has taken in dealing with this matter.

Decision in case 2124/2017/KT on the treatment of certain journalists by the European Parliament’s Information Office in Cyprus

Giovedì | 25 aprile 2019

The complaint was about how the European Parliament’s Information Office in Cyprus selected journalists to travel to a conference in Brussels organised by Parliament. The complainant considered that the Information Office´s outreach policy is not transparent, especially when it comes to selecting journalists to travel abroad to cover its activities.

The Ombudsman found that Parliament’s criteria for selecting journalists were reasonable and concluded that there was no maladministration.