Keresés a vizsgálatok között
1 - 20 az 63 találatból
The failure by the EU Delegation to Bosnia and Herzegovina to reply to emails concerning a scholarship under the S.I.P.P.A.S project
Hétfő | 30 január 2023
Az Európai Parlament határozata egy konferenciatolmács alkalmazására vonatkozó szerződés jellegének megváltoztatásáról
Péntek | 18 november 2022
Decision in the case 1515/2022/NH on the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)’s decision to reject a request for reimbursement of expenses incurred when registering a trademark
Hétfő | 05 szeptember 2022
Hogyan kezelte az Európai Bizottság (algériai küldöttsége) egy szerződő félnek a Covid19-világjárvány miatt felmerült többletköltségei megtérítésére irányuló kérelmét
Hétfő | 04 július 2022
Egy uniós alkalmazott halálával kapcsolatos információkérés Európai Parlament általi kezelésének módja
Hétfő | 31 január 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a complaint that Poland breached EU law in how it managed EU funding of a local project - CHAP(2019)01233 (case 2181/2021/DL)
Szerda | 26 január 2022
Egy alkalmazott volt házastársa által benyújtott juttatás iránti kérelem Európai Beruházási Bank (EBB) általi kezelése
Hétfő | 04 október 2021
Decision in case 616/2020/DL on how the European Commission dealt with a contractor that had not paid its consultants
Szerda | 19 május 2021
The complainant worked as an expert for an external contractor to the EU Delegation to Ghana. Not having been paid for her work, the complainant turned to the Ombudsman, claiming that the EU Delegation had failed to ensure that the external contractor respects its obligations towards the experts.
The Ombudsman found that both the EU Delegation and the European Commission had acted in accordance with the applicable rules when withholding some payments under the contract. She also found that they had taken appropriate action vis-a-vis the contractor to try to resolve the situation that affected the complainant. The Ombudsman considers that the Commission has adequate mechanisms in place to monitor contractors, and she trusts the Commission will use these mechanisms to monitor the situation and to take action within its remit if needed.
The Ombudsman therefore closed the case with a finding of no maladministration.
Az Európai Bizottság (PMO) mulasztása arra vonatkozóan, hogy választ adjon a panaszosnak, aki nyugdíjas, hogy miért vontak meg tőle egy támogatást
Péntek | 26 február 2021
Decision in case 784/2019/JN on the European Commission´s decision to reject certain costs in the context of an EU-funded project supporting education in Somalia
Kedd | 13 október 2020
The case concerned the European Commission´s decision to reject almost EUR 50 000 in the context of an EU-funded project supporting education in Somalia.
The Ombudsman made the preliminary finding that the Commission´s decision was not fair. She made a corresponding proposal for a solution.
The Commission disagreed with the Ombudsman´s proposal and provided additional explanations for its position. The grant agreement, it said, contains a list of non-eligible costs including salary costs of the personnel of national administrations, at issue here. Declaring the costs eligible, although they are clearly ineligible, could create a precedent that the rules in question can be circumvented. In light of these and further explanations, the Ombudsman reached the conclusion that no further inquiries were justified. The grant agreement, read as a whole, supports the Commission´s position sufficiently.
However, the Ombudsman considered it regrettable that an organisation that successfully carried out a project in good faith and incurred the costs in question, should find itself in this situation. She suggested that the Commission consider how it could improve the clarity of the information in its ‘grant agreements’ with entities selected to carry out EU-funded projects, to avoid similar cases arising in the future.
Az EU ghánai küldöttsége mulasztása arra vonatkozóan, hogy biztosítsa, hogy külső vállalkozója kifizesse a tanácsadókat
Csütörtök | 23 április 2020
Decision in case 2084/2018/NH on how the European External Action Service and its mediation service handled a complaint from a staff member about alleged harassment
Szerda | 22 április 2020
The case concerned how the EEAS handled an e-mail with harassment allegations, sent to its Mediation Service by a staff member in an EU Delegation. In the course of the Ombudsman’s inquiry, the EEAS explained how the Mediation Service had dealt with the complainant’s concerns and why the file had been closed.
The Ombudsman found that the explanations given by the EEAS were reasonable. The EEAS Mediation Service handled the complainant’s harassment claim in an informal way, in line with its mandate. The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the finding that there was no maladministration by the EEAS.
Decision in case 1377/2019/PL on how the European Commission dealt with a transfer of pension rights from the national Greek system into the EU pension system
Hétfő | 17 február 2020
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 8/2020/DL on the EU Delegation to Nigeria's withholding of payments for delivered services under a framework contract
Péntek | 31 január 2020
Az Európai Külügyi Szolgálat mulasztása arra vonatkozóan, hogy válaszoljon egy, hibás módon egy névrokonnak kifizetett kiküldetési költségek megtérítésére vonatkozó kérelemre
Csütörtök | 19 december 2019
Decision in case 1506/2018/JF on the alleged differential treatment regarding the daily allowance paid to an expert working on a twinning project run by the Delegation of the European Union in Albania
Péntek | 20 szeptember 2019
The case concerned the daily allowance paid to the complainant, an expert working on a twinning project in Albania.
The local Delegation and the twinning project leader agreed to pay a reduced daily allowance to the complainant. The project leader subsequently recruited two other experts whom it paid a higher daily allowance. Dissatisfied, the complainant asked that his allowance be raised with effect from the beginning of his work on the twinning project. The Delegation agreed to raise the allowance but refused to apply it retroactively. The complainant then turned to the Ombudsman arguing that the Delegation’s position was discriminatory.
The Ombudsman found that the applicable rules allowed experts to be paid different daily allowances. These rules also allowed the amounts of the allowance to be changed, but for the future only. The Ombudsman concluded that the Delegation had acted in accordance with the applicable rules and closed the case with a finding of no maladministration.
Décision de la Médiatrice européenne dans l’affaire 1059/2019/NH concernant le refus du Service européen pour l’action extérieure de rembourser des frais d’avocats
Csütörtök | 04 július 2019