Prikazuju se 1 - 20 od 157 rezultata
How the European Commission handled a request for public access to documents related to an EU-funded project concerning a study into risk of brain cancer from exposure to radiofrequency fields in childhood and adolescence ('Mobi-Kids' project)
Ponedjeljak | 05 prosinca 2022
Kako je Europska izvršna agencija za istraživanje procijenila financijsku sposobnost poduzeća koje se prijavljuje za sudjelovanje u projektu koji financira EU u okviru programa Obzor Europa
Četvrtak | 22 rujna 2022
Decision concerning the rejection of the Research Executive Agency’s (REA) of an application for funding under the programme Horizon Europe and the European Commission’s rejection of the request for review (1553/2022/PL)
Četvrtak | 08 rujna 2022
The European Commission’s refusal to give public access to a document concerning a mineral exploration research project that received EU funds under the Horizon 2020 programme
Srijeda | 17 kolovoza 2022
The European Commission’s refusal to give public access to documents concerning a mineral exploration research project that received EU funds under the Horizon 2020 programme
Petak | 22 srpnja 2022
Propust Europske komisije da odgovori na e-poruke o kvaliteti zraka u kabini zrakoplova u komercijalnom zračnom prijevozu
Petak | 17 lipnja 2022
Odbijanje Europske komisije da omogući javni pristup dokumentu koji se odnosi na projekt istraživanja minerala u okviru programa Obzor 2020
Petak | 22 srpnja 2022
Kako je Europska komisija postupila u vezi sa zabrinutostima u pogledu Europske referentne mreže za Pierre-Robinov sindrom
Srijeda | 01 lipnja 2022
Izvršna agencija za Europsko vijeće za inovacije i MSP-ove (EISMEA) raskinula je sporazum o dodjeli bespovratnih sredstava jer je primatelj bespovratnih sredstava izgubio status MSP-a
Četvrtak | 24 ožujka 2022
Izostanak odgovora Europskog ureda za borbu protiv prijevara (OLAF) na pritužbu vezanu uz navodnu krađu intelektualnog vlasništva
Petak | 10 prosinca 2021
Izostanak odgovora Europske komisije na prepisku u vezi sa smanjenjem proračuna za ugovore o dodjeli bespovratnih sredstava
Srijeda | 01 prosinca 2021
Navodni propust Komisije da odgovori na dopis o Europskoj referentnoj mreži za Pierre-Robinov sindrom
Četvrtak | 09 rujna 2021
Decision in case 1046/2021/LM on how the European Commission handled a request for review of the Research Executive Agency’s assessment of a project proposal under Horizon 2020
Utorak | 27 srpnja 2021
How the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
Ponedjeljak | 05 srpnja 2021
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (joint cases 1242/2020/SF and 1380/2020/SF)
Četvrtak | 01 srpnja 2021
The complaints concerned the European Commission’s decision not to extend funding for those carrying out research under the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Programme (MSCA) following the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers. The complainants considered that the measures the Commission put in place to support MSCA researchers during the COVID-19 crisis were insufficient, as they would not enable them to continue their work.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry into how the Commission communicated with project partners that received grants under the MSCA, and the researchers carrying out the work for those project partners, about the measures they could take to address the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on their projects.
During the inquiry, the Ombudsman shared her preliminary findings with the Commission. In particular, the inquiry showed that, overall, the Commission had taken appropriate action to communicate the measures that could be taken to support researchers according to the applicable rules. However, as no solution had been found for the complainants, she urged the Commission to explore whether additional funding could exceptionally be awarded to the complainants and researchers in similarly difficult situations.
The Commission broadly accepted the Ombudsman’s preliminary findings but reiterated that, due to legal and financial constraints, it cannot provide any exceptional funding.
The Ombudsman appreciates the difficult situation faced by many MSCA researchers due to the COVID-19 crisis. At the same time, she acknowledges the Commission’s commitment to find solutions within the applicable rules for those researchers impacted. While it is regrettable that a solution could not be found for the complainants and researchers in similar situations, the Ombudsman closed the case as further inquiries would not result in a more satisfactory outcome for the complainants. However, she made two suggestions for improvement.
How the European Border and Coast Guard (Frontex) dealt with multiple requests for public access to documents concerning contracts with private companies
Petak | 18 lipnja 2021
Decision in case 2067/2020/MIG on the European Border and Coast Guard Agency’s (Frontex) handling of multiple requests for public access to documents made by a single applicant
Srijeda | 16 lipnja 2021
The case concerned how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) handled multiple requests for public access to documents made by a single applicant. Frontex considered that the scope of the complainant’s multiple requests, which had been made in close temporal proximity, was too extensive to be processed in parallel. It therefore proposed, as a fair solution, to put them in a queue and process them in turn. The complainant did not agree to this approach.
The Ombudsman noted that it was not clear how extensive the scope of the complainant’s requests was and how much work it would entail to assess whether the documents concerned can be released. She proposed that Frontex should immediately recommence processing the complainant’s access requests, beginning with the most urgent one, as indicated by the complainant during the inquiry. She also proposed that Frontex provide the complainant with a list of all documents at issue to enable him to determine the priority of each request.
Frontex accepted the Ombudsman’s proposal and provided the complainant with a reply to the indicated access request shortly thereafter.
The Ombudsman welcomed Frontex’s response to her proposal for a solution and closed the case, calling on Frontex to make every effort to ensure that the complainant’s access requests are now dealt with quickly. The Ombudsman also encourages Frontex, in an effort to avoid delays, to improve its communication with applicants when attempting to find a fair solution on how to process extensive requests.
Reply of the European Border and Coast Guard Agency’s (Frontex) to the European Ombudsman's proposal for a solution in case 2067/2020/MIG on Frontex's handling of multiple requests for public access to documents made by a single applicant
Četvrtak | 06 svibnja 2021
Proposal of the European Ombudsman for a solution in case 2067/2020/MIG on the European Border and Coast Guard Agency’s (Frontex) handling of multiple requests for public access to documents made by a single applicant
Utorak | 20 travnja 2021
Srijeda | 14 travnja 2021