Prikazuju se 1 - 20 od 70 rezultata
The European Medicines Agency’s failure to respond to a complaint concerning its advice against the use of ivermectin as a medicine for the prevention or treatment of COVID-19
Četvrtak | 22 srpnja 2021
Ponedjeljak | 12 srpnja 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Petak | 18 lipnja 2021
Petak | 18 lipnja 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Data Protection Supervisor on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Petak | 18 lipnja 2021
Decision in case 616/2020/DL on how the European Commission dealt with a contractor that had not paid its consultants
Srijeda | 19 svibnja 2021
The complainant worked as an expert for an external contractor to the EU Delegation to Ghana. Not having been paid for her work, the complainant turned to the Ombudsman, claiming that the EU Delegation had failed to ensure that the external contractor respects its obligations towards the experts.
The Ombudsman found that both the EU Delegation and the European Commission had acted in accordance with the applicable rules when withholding some payments under the contract. She also found that they had taken appropriate action vis-a-vis the contractor to try to resolve the situation that affected the complainant. The Ombudsman considers that the Commission has adequate mechanisms in place to monitor contractors, and she trusts the Commission will use these mechanisms to monitor the situation and to take action within its remit if needed.
The Ombudsman therefore closed the case with a finding of no maladministration.
Propust Europske komisije da potvrdi primitak pritužbe koja se odnosi na promjenu pružatelja internetskih usluga u Njemačkoj
Utorak | 18 svibnja 2021
The European Commission’s failure to reply to concerns raised about a contract between the Commission President and a German public relations company
Četvrtak | 26 studenoga 2020
Decision of the European Ombudsman in case 1555/2020/DL on the European Commission's failure to reply to concerns raised about a contract between the Commission President and a German public relations company
Utorak | 24 studenoga 2020
Reply from the European Commission to the European Ombudsman's information request on the European Commission’s failure to reply to concerns raised about a contract between the Commission President and a German public relations company
Ponedjeljak | 23 studenoga 2020
Propust Europske komisije da odgovori na zabrinutost zbog ugovora između predsjednika Komisije i njemačkog poduzeća za odnose s javnošću
Ponedjeljak | 12 listopada 2020
Decision in case 1498/2019/NH on the European Parliament not sending its reply to an access to documents request by e-mail
Četvrtak | 28 svibnja 2020
The case concerned the refusal by the European Parliament to send a decision refusing public access to documents by e-mail.
The Ombudsman found that Parliament’s reply to the complainant was reasonable in the given context, as the complainant had already received the decision by registered post.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there had been no maladministration by Parliament in this case.
Četvrtak | 23 travnja 2020
Propust Komisije da potvrdi primitak pritužbe zbog povrede protiv Njemačke u pogledu Direktive o autorskim pravima (2014/26/EU)
Petak | 03 travnja 2020
Decision in case 911/2019/LM concerning the way in which the European Commission representation in Italy evaluated a proposal to become partner of the
Srijeda | 04 ožujka 2020
Odluka u predmetu 1484/2019/UNK o načinu na koji je Europska komisija postupila sa zahtjevom za potpuni javni pristup nacrtima članka o direktivi o autorskim pravima objavljenima na mrežnom mjestu Komisije
Ponedjeljak | 02 prosinca 2019
Predmet se odnosio na odluku Europske komisije da redigira imena svojih članova osoblja u dokumentu prije nego što je podnositelju pritužbe odobrila pristup tom dokumentu.
Ombudsman je smatrao da je Komisija pravilno postupila redigiranjem imena. Stoga je zaključio istragu utvrdivši da nije bilo nepravilnosti.
Odluka 552/2018/MIG o odbijanju Europske komisije da odobri javni pristup dokumentima koji se odnose na njemački provedbeni zakon o društvenim mrežama
Srijeda | 20 studenoga 2019
Predmet se također odnosio na javni pristup dokumentima u posjedu Europske komisije koji se odnose na njemački provedbeni zakon o društvenim mrežama, nacionalni propis čiji je cilj suzbijati lažne vijesti na društvenim mrežama.
Ombudsman je predložio rješenje te zamolio Komisiju da preispita svoje (djelomično) odbijanje da odobri javni pristup dokumentima. Komisija nije odgovorila u roku koji je odredio Ombudsman. Ombudsman je zatim izdao preporuku Komisiji.
Komisija je odgovorila da ne prihvaća Ombudsmanov prijedlog.
Ombudsman izražava žaljenje što Komisija nije prihvatila njegovu preporuku te i dalje smatra da se radilo o nepravilnosti u postupanju.
Ponedjeljak | 14 listopada 2019
Decision in case 1731/2018/FP on the refusal by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency to grant public access to the documents submitted by a public undertaking for a funding approval in the context of a call for proposals by the Connecting Europe Facility
Petak | 04 listopada 2019
The case concerned the refusal by the Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (INEA) to grant public access to documents submitted by a national cybersecurity authority that was seeking funding from INEA.
The Ombudsman inquired into the issue and proposed that INEA should partially disclose the requested documents, redacting only information that it considers to be genuinely commercially sensitive or personal data.
INEA rejected the Ombudsman’s proposal, arguing that most of the information that could be disclosed was already in the public domain and the proposed partial disclosure would impose a disproportionate administrative burden on INEA. It also said that it accepted the arguments of the national cybersecurity authority regarding the likely damage disclosure would cause to its commercial interests.
The Ombudsman found INEA’s refusal to grant even partial access to the requested documents to be maladministration and recommended that INEA partially disclose the relevant Grant application.
INEA rejected the Ombudsman’s recommendation. Consequently, the Ombudsman now closes the case, confirming her finding of maladministration.
Reply from the European Commission to the European Ombudsman's recommendation on the European Commission’s refusal of public access to documents concerning the German “NetzDG” law
Srijeda | 04 rujna 2019