Vous souhaitez déposer une plainte contre une institution ou un organe de l’Union européenne ?
Rechercher des enquêtes
Affichage 1 - 20 des 390 résultats
Decision on how the European Parliament took into account technical problems in a selection procedure for intercultural and language professionals (case 718/2022/PL)
Vendredi | 01 juillet 2022
How the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the application of a candidate in a selection procedure for the recruitment of administrators in the field of external relations (EPSO/AD/382/20)
Vendredi | 01 juillet 2022
The impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU
Mardi | 21 juin 2022
Decision on how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a selection procedure for EU staff in the field of international cooperation (case 270/2021/KT)
Lundi | 20 juin 2022
The case concerned how the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) assessed the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting EU staff in the field of international cooperation.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the complainant’s qualifications and, therefore, closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Closing note on the Strategic Initiative concerning the impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU (SI/3/2021/VS)
Vendredi | 17 juin 2022
How the European Commission took into account the COVID-19 pandemic on a staff member
Jeudi | 02 juin 2022
Decision 1222/2021/TM on how the European Commission evaluated a grant application on the topic of media freedom and investigative journalism
Jeudi | 05 mai 2022
Paiement par la Commission (PMO) d’allocations pour un enfant en situation de garde partagée à un seul des parents
Mardi | 12 avril 2022
Absence de réponse du SEAE (Service européen pour l’action extérieure) à des courriels concernant l’interruption des travaux du plaignant
Vendredi | 01 avril 2022
Report on the meeting between European Ombudsman representatives and European Data Protection Supervisor representatives
Jeudi | 31 mars 2022
Traitement réservé par le Service européen pour l’action extérieure (SEAE) à une demande de télétravail émanant d’un expert externe en raison des restrictions liées à la COVID-19
Lundi | 07 mars 2022
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) carried out a selection procedure for officers in its Standing Corps (case 56/2021/NH)
Vendredi | 04 mars 2022
The case concerned the decision by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) not to select the complainant as an officer in its Standing Corps following an interview as part of a selection procedure. The complainant argued that his application had received unjustifiably low scores. In addition, the complainant was concerned that Frontex did not allow him to request a review of the decision.
The Ombudsman found that the selection board set up by Frontex had followed the vacancy notice when scoring the complainant’s application. Frontex confirmed that it had processed the complainant’s request for review, but acknowledged that the information provided to the complainant may not have been clear. In the course of the inquiry, Frontex implemented changes in its practices, which the Ombudsman welcomed.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by Frontex.
Decision on the European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency’s (GSA) rejection of a submission in a contest to design a logo (case 423/2021/OAM)
Jeudi | 03 mars 2022
The European Global Navigation Satellite Systems Agency (GSA) rejected the complainant’s submission in a contest to design a logo because there was a technical problem with the submission.
The Ombudsman’s view is that the GSA should have dealt with the matter differently and in accordance with the standards that citizens are entitled to expect from the EU administration. It should also have communicated in a more consistent and timely way with the complainant about the technical problem. However, as the contest procedure has now ended, the Ombudsman considered that further inquiries in this case are not justified.
Informations erronées sur le statut d’un candidat figurant sur la liste de sélection d’agents contractuels (CAST) gérée par l’Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)
Mercredi | 16 février 2022
Decision on how the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) handled a recruitment procedure (complaint: 1388/2021/JN)
Mercredi | 09 février 2022