Vous souhaitez déposer une plainte contre une institution ou un organe de l’Union européenne ?
Rechercher des enquêtes
Affichage 1 - 20 des 199 résultats
Decision on how the European Parliament communicated with an applicant for a traineeship (case 1266/2022/LM)
Jeudi | 15 décembre 2022
The case concerned how the European Parliament communicated with an individual regarding his application for a traineeship. The complainant contended that he was shortlisted, interviewed and then rejected before the period for shortlisting candidates had formally started. He argued that this was in breach of the selection procedure rules.
The Ombudsman found that the Parliament had initially miscommunicated with the complainant, but that it promptly remedied this. The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration but encouraged the Parliament to improve the information provided on the dedicated webpage for the traineeship in question, notably about the possibility to interview candidates.
Entscheidung in der oben genannten Angelegenheit über die Entscheidung der Europäischen Exekutivagentur für Gesundheit und Digitales (HaDEA) bereits gebilligte Fördermittel nicht zu gewähren
Jeudi | 01 décembre 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with an infringement complaint against Poland concerning EU-funded survey works in south-eastern Poland and the Polish judicial system (case 1296/2022/ABZ)
Mercredi | 23 novembre 2022
Décision du Parlement européen de modifier la nature du contrat en vertu duquel un interprète de conférence a été employé
Vendredi | 18 novembre 2022
Modalités d’organisation, par l’Agence européenne de garde-frontières et de garde-côtes (Frontex), du test en ligne en vue de recruter des spécialistes de la coopération internationale [(GFIV) - RCT-2022-00024]
Mardi | 13 septembre 2022
Decision concerning the rejection of the Research Executive Agency’s (REA) of an application for funding under the programme Horizon Europe and the European Commission’s rejection of the request for review (1553/2022/PL)
Jeudi | 08 septembre 2022
Traitement par la Commission européenne (DG COMP) d’une plainte concernant la divulgation d’une demande de clémence en Roumanie
Mercredi | 31 août 2022
Absence de réponse de la Commission européenne à une lettre concernant le projet financé par l’UE dans le sud de l’Espagne
Vendredi | 29 juillet 2022
Decision on how the European External Action Service (EEAS) dealt with concerns about the pre-selection of candidates for the Junior Professionals in Delegations programme (case 1537/2021/OAM)
Mardi | 28 juin 2022
The case concerned how the European External Action Service’s handled a complaint concerning the pre-selection of candidates by Romania for the Junior Professionals in Delegations programme. The EEAS said that, according to the rules, it cannot review Member States’ assessments of candidates, unless there is a manifest error or substantiated allegations that the procedure was not fair, transparent and objective, which was not the case. The Ombudsman found the EEAS’s explanation of its role, as well as its assessment of this case, was reasonable.
The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry finding no maladministration.
Absence d’accusé de réception par la Commission européenne d’une plainte concernant les projets de réhabilitation de la zone côtière du sud de l’Espagne
Vendredi | 08 avril 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a complaint against the Spanish region of Aragón for its rules on the use of coal in heating installations (case 407/2022/PL)
Mardi | 15 mars 2022
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) carried out a selection procedure for officers in its Standing Corps (case 56/2021/NH)
Vendredi | 04 mars 2022
The case concerned the decision by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) not to select the complainant as an officer in its Standing Corps following an interview as part of a selection procedure. The complainant argued that his application had received unjustifiably low scores. In addition, the complainant was concerned that Frontex did not allow him to request a review of the decision.
The Ombudsman found that the selection board set up by Frontex had followed the vacancy notice when scoring the complainant’s application. Frontex confirmed that it had processed the complainant’s request for review, but acknowledged that the information provided to the complainant may not have been clear. In the course of the inquiry, Frontex implemented changes in its practices, which the Ombudsman welcomed.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by Frontex.
Manière dont la Commission a traité une plainte relative à une violation du droit de l’Union par la Pologne et d’autres États membres
Vendredi | 18 février 2022
Absence de réponse appropriée de la part de la Commission européenne à une demande concernant le certificat COVID numérique de l’UE
Mardi | 11 janvier 2022
Non-communication, par la Commission européenne, d’informations à jour à un plaignant concernant l’état d’avancement du traitement d’une plainte pour infraction concernant des stages dans les juridictions italiennes
Mercredi | 15 décembre 2021
Absence de réponse de la Commission européenne à une plainte pour infraction concernant une prétendue violation par l’Irlande du règlement général sur la protection des données (RGPD)
Vendredi | 03 décembre 2021
Decision concerning how the European Parliament Citizens' Inquiries Unit replied to a request concerning social security in Latvia (Complaint 1953/2021/LM)
Mardi | 23 novembre 2021