Vous souhaitez déposer une plainte contre une institution ou un organe de l’Union européenne ?
Rechercher des enquêtes
Affichage 1 - 20 des 97 résultats
Decision on the European Personnel Selection Office’s (EPSO) decision not to allow a candidate in COVID-19 quarantine to reschedule a test (case 2223/2021/ABZ)
Mercredi | 18 janvier 2023
The case concerned the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to allow a candidate, who was placed in COVID-19 quarantine, to reschedule her test in the context of a selection procedure for contract agent staff (CAST Permanent selection procedure).
The Ombudsman found that EPSO provided reasonable explanations as to why it was not able to provide an alternative testing date to the complainant. On that basis, the Ombudsman closed the inquiry with a finding that there was no maladministration by EPSO.
Manière dont la Commission européenne veille à ce que les critères d’éligibilité pour participer aux missions d’observation électorale de l’UE (MOE UE) soient non discriminatoires et transparents
Lundi | 21 novembre 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a request to extend the deadline for a retired staff member to request the ‘resettlement allowance’ (complaint 1428/2021/FA)
Lundi | 07 novembre 2022
The case concerns the European Commission‘s refusal to extend the time limit for a retired staff member to request the resettlement allowance in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The complainant argued that due to the outbreak of the pandemic, she was not able to organise her resettlement to her place of origin within the prescribed time limit and asked the Commission to grant her an extension.
The Ombudsman found that the decision of the Commission is in line with the Staff Regulations and EU case-law. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision in the case 1484/2022/LDS on how the European Union Aviation Safety Agency handled a complaint concerning its advice on the impact of the war in Ukraine for private aviation
Vendredi | 02 septembre 2022
Refus de la Commission (délégation de l’UE à Jakarta) de procéder à un versement au titre d’une convention de subvention dans le cadre du projet Share de l’UE
Vendredi | 15 juillet 2022
Décision de la Commission européenne tendant à récupérer le financement de l’UE accordé dans le cadre d’un contrat pour la fourniture d’une assistance technique dans un pays tiers
Vendredi | 01 juillet 2022
The impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU
Mardi | 21 juin 2022
Closing note on the Strategic Initiative concerning the impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU (SI/3/2021/VS)
Vendredi | 17 juin 2022
Manière dont la Commission européenne a tenu compte de la pandémie de COVID-19 concernant un membre du personnel
Jeudi | 02 juin 2022
Absence de réponse de la Cour de justice à tous les arguments concernant ses exigences dans le cadre des procédures de sélection des traducteurs freelance pour la traduction en allemand
Vendredi | 08 avril 2022
Report on the meeting between European Ombudsman representatives and European Data Protection Supervisor representatives
Jeudi | 31 mars 2022
Décision de l’Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO) de ne pas autoriser un candidat en quarantaine pour COVID-19 à modifier la date d’une épreuve
Jeudi | 03 mars 2022
Report on the meeting between European Ombudsman and European Commission representatives
Vendredi | 19 novembre 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Vendredi | 18 juin 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Data Protection Supervisor on artificial intelligence and the EU administration
Vendredi | 18 juin 2021
The impact of artificial intelligence on the EU administration and public administrations in the EU
Vendredi | 18 juin 2021
Decision in case 964/2020/JN on how the European Commission evaluated a tender in a public procurement procedure for the translation of a report on the judicial reform in Cyprus
Mardi | 11 mai 2021
The case concerned the European Commission´s decision to reject a tender in a public procurement procedure for the translation of a report on the judicial reform in Cyprus. The complainant considered that the Commission had been wrong in rejecting his tender because it considered he did not meet the specifications for the required experience. In the complainant’s view, the Commission should have asked him for clarifications.
The Ombudsman found that the Commission acted reasonably, and closed the inquiry finding no maladministration. She trusts that, going forward, the Commission will ensure that unsuccessful tenderers receive an adequate explanation of the reasons why their tender has been rejected, without having to ask for clarification.
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 428/2021/JN on how the European Commission handled correspondence with an Irish farmer concerning the Single Farm Payment scheme
Jeudi | 08 avril 2021
How the European Commission and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) set up the EU Database for Information on Substances of Concern In Articles (SCIP database)
Lundi | 07 décembre 2020