Vous souhaitez déposer une plainte contre une institution ou un organe de l’Union européenne ?
Rechercher des enquêtes
Affichage 1 - 20 des 232 résultats
The failure by the European Commission to take a final decision within the applicable time limit on a request for public access to documents concerning encryption in law enforcement
Mercredi | 26 avril 2023
Decision on the European Commission’s decision to recover from a partner in an EU-funded programme funds that were withheld by a bank (case 383/2020/SF)
Mercredi | 29 mars 2023
The case concerned the European Commission’s decision to recover over EUR 420 000 in unused funds from a consultancy that carried out an EU-funded programme on justice reform in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The EU funds had been deposited in a local bank, which subsequently became insolvent.
The consultancy argued that the Commission had no right to hold it liable for the unused funds that had become unavailable because of the bank’s insolvency. Furthermore, it considered that it had not been given the opportunity to express its views during the audit and recovery procedures and that it had not acted negligently.
The Commission argued that the consultancy had been given the opportunity to express its views but did not provide comments. The Commission further considered that the complainant should take legal action against the bank to get the funds released as part of the liquidation procedure.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry into whether the Commission’s decision to recover the unavailable funds from the complainant was reasonable. She was not satisfied that the Commission had acted in accordance with the principles of good administration and proposed as a solution that it reconsider its decision that the complainant bear the risk for the insolvency of the local bank in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The Commission did not agree with the Ombudsman’s assessment but stated that, in accordance with the principle of proportionality, it was ready to give the complainant a new opportunity to provide information that might allow the Commission to open an amicable settlement aimed at partially sharing the economic burden of the lost funds.
The Ombudsman welcomes the Commission’s willingness to look into an amicable solution with a view to sharing the burden of the loss of the funds with the complainant. She considers that the complainant has provided the necessary information.
Thus, the Ombudsman closed the case as further inquiries would not result in a more satisfactory outcome for the complainant. To try to avoid similar situations arising in future, she made three suggestions for improvement.
Manière dont la Commission européenne traite une plainte pour infraction contre l’Allemagne — CHAP(2021)1727, procédure de renvoi préjudiciel et adhésion aux chambres de commerce
Lundi | 13 mars 2023
Decision on the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex)'s decision to reject the complainant's tender for lack of evidence of payment of taxes [Complaint 145/2023/LM]
Vendredi | 17 février 2023
Decision on the above complaint against the European Commission concerning its reply to a letter concerning an infringement by Italy of the European Account Preservation Order procedure
Jeudi | 16 février 2023
Manquement de la Commission européenne à accuser réception d’une plainte pour infraction concernant des passeports délivrés par la Roumanie
Mercredi | 15 février 2023
Absence de réponse du Service européen pour l’action extérieure à des courriels concernant une affaire judiciaire en Bulgarie
Mercredi | 01 février 2023
Decision on how the European Commission replied to a complaint alleging that Ireland breached EU rules on the European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims (1108/2022/KT)
Vendredi | 02 décembre 2022
Absence d’enregistrement de la Commission européenne d’une plainte contre l’Espagne concernant l’aide juridique aux associations de protection de l’environnement
Lundi | 24 octobre 2022
Manquement de la Commission européenne à accuser réception d’une plainte pour infraction à l’encontre de l’Allemagne
Mardi | 18 octobre 2022
Absence de réponse de l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (EUROPOL) à deux demandes d’accès du public à des documents concernant des logiciels de surveillance
Lundi | 17 octobre 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with letters concerning an alleged breach of the fundamental right to an effective remedy and a fair trial by the Dutch courts (case 1487/2022/ABZ)
Jeudi | 01 septembre 2022
Absence de traitement par l’Agence de l’Union européenne pour la coopération des services répressifs (Europol) de deux demandes d’accès du public à des documents
Mardi | 05 juillet 2022
Proposal for a solution on the European Commission’s decision to hold a partner in an EU programme liable for the insolvency of a bank (case 383/2020/SF)
Mardi | 28 juin 2022
How the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) deals with complaints about alleged fundamental rights breaches through its 'Complaints Mechanism'
Mercredi | 08 juin 2022