Hae tutkimuksia
Näytetään 1–20 yhteensä 322 tuloksesta
How the European Commission handled infringement proceedings against Germany about planning laws and retail space
Perjantaina | 02 kesäkuuta 2023
How the European Commission dealt with several requests for public access to documents concerning digital rights and online surveillance
Perjantaina | 02 kesäkuuta 2023
The European Commission’s delay in assessing and publishing several European Assessment Documents for steel products used in the construction sector
Torstaina | 25 toukokuuta 2023
How the European Commission dealt with an infringement complaint - CHAP(2022)01217, Finland, judicial dealing with a patent matter
Tiistaina | 16 toukokuuta 2023
The Council of the EU's refusal to give full public access to a legal opinion on the proposed EU directive on adequate minimum wages
Tiistaina | 16 toukokuuta 2023
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the Council of the European Union on the European Ombudsman’s recommendation in the case 1834/2022/NH
Maanantaina | 15 toukokuuta 2023
How the European Commission ensures that there are no conflicts of interest with external experts involved in evaluating project proposals under the European Defence Fund
Perjantaina | 05 toukokuuta 2023
How the European Commission dealt with concerns about how it is carrying out an impact assessment of new genomic techniques in relation to the application of EU rules on genetically modified organisms
Torstaina | 27 huhtikuuta 2023
Reply of the European Commission on how it ensures that there are no conflicts of interest with external experts involved in evaluating project proposals under the European Defence Fund
Torstaina | 27 huhtikuuta 2023
Euroopan komission tapa käsitellä huolenaiheita, jotka koskevat sitä, miten se suorittaa uusien genomitekniikoiden vaikutustenarvioinnin muuntogeenisiä organismeja koskevien EU:n sääntöjen soveltamisen yhteydessä
Maanantaina | 24 huhtikuuta 2023
The composition of the European Commission's Regulatory Scrutiny Board and how it interacts with interest representatives
Tiistaina | 11 huhtikuuta 2023
Euroopan komission sääntelyntarkastelulautakunnan kokoonpano ja sen vuorovaikutus edunvalvojien kanssa
Tiistaina | 04 huhtikuuta 2023
Recommendation on how the Council of the European Union handled a request for public access to the legal opinion on the proposed EU directive on adequate minimum wages (case 1834/2022/NH)
Tiistaina | 04 huhtikuuta 2023
The case concerned a request for public access to an opinion of the legal service of the Council of the EU on a draft law on adequate minimum wages.
The Council granted the complainant access to parts of the opinion in May 2021. It invoked two exceptions under the EU legislation on public access to documents to justify redacting the remaining parts of the document, arguing that full disclosure could undermine the decision-making process (since negotiations on the law were still ongoing at the time) and the protection of legal advice.
The Ombudsman found that the Council had not demonstrated how disclosure of the document would undermine its decision-making process or its capacity to seek and obtain frank, objective and comprehensive advice. Her view is that greater transparency when the negotiations were still ongoing would have greatly facilitated public participation in the EU’s legislative process.
The Ombudsman therefore considered that the Council’s refusal to grant full public access to the legal opinion at the time of the confirmatory decision constituted maladministration. As the complainant is still interested in receiving full public access to the opinion at this stage, the Ombudsman made a corresponding recommendation.
Follow -up reply from the European Commission on how it handled infringement proceedings against Germany about planning laws and retail space
Perjantaina | 31 maaliskuuta 2023
Euroopan komission tapa vastata sähköpostiviesteihin, jotka koskivat sitä, että Espanja on mahdollisesti rikkonut hissejä koskevia EU:n sääntöjä
Torstaina | 30 maaliskuuta 2023
Euroopan komission kieltäytyminen pitämästä kantelijaa asianomaisena osapuolena valtiontukimenettelyssä – Saksa, Elbtower-hanke Hampurissa
Perjantaina | 24 maaliskuuta 2023
The European Commission's refusal to give public access to documents concerning a project under the EU Defence Industrial Development Programme
Torstaina | 16 maaliskuuta 2023
Decision on the European Commission's refusal to give public access to a proposal and a grant agreement concerning an EU funded project in the defence industry (case 1980/2022/NH)
Tiistaina | 14 maaliskuuta 2023
The case concerned a request for public access to documents concerning technology developed and military equipment produced as part of an EU-funded project in the defence industry. The European Commission refused access to the two documents it identified, arguing that full disclosure could undermine the public interest as regards public security, defence and military matters, the protection of the privacy and the integrity of the individual and the protection of commercial interests.
The Ombudsman inquiry team inspected the documents in question and found that the Commission’s refusal to disclose them was justified due to their sensitive nature.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that the Commission had not acted with maladministration in this case.
Decision on the European Commission's refusal to give public access to a dataset containing company names and details held in the Business Registers Interconnection System on the ground that the requested document does not exist (case 926/2022/KR)
Tiistaina | 28 helmikuuta 2023
The case concerned a request for public access to a dataset containing company names and details held in the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS). BRIS interconnects the business registers of EU Member States and is operated by the Commission.
In refusing public access, the Commission argued that the requested dataset does not qualify as an existing document, in line with EU case law, because it could not be retrieved as part of the normal operations of the BRIS IT-system and would require additional programming.
The Ombudsman found that, given the specificities of the database in question, substantial investment would be required to extract the dataset from BRIS and present it to the complainant in a readable format. The decision of the Commission to refuse access was therefore reasonable.
The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration.