¿Tiene una reclamación contra una institución u órgano de la UE?
Consultar investigaciones
Mostrando 1 - 20 de 190 resultados
How the European Commission dealt with complaints against Poland as regards the EU-funded surveying works in south-eastern Poland and the Polish judiciary system
Sábado | 06 agosto 2022
The European Commission’s failure to reply to a letter concerning the EU-funded project in Southern Spain
Martes | 02 agosto 2022
Decision on how the European External Action Service (EEAS) dealt with concerns about the pre-selection of candidates for the Junior Professionals in Delegations programme (case 1537/2021/OAM)
Martes | 28 junio 2022
The case concerned how the European External Action Service’s handled a complaint concerning the pre-selection of candidates by Romania for the Junior Professionals in Delegations programme. The EEAS said that, according to the rules, it cannot review Member States’ assessments of candidates, unless there is a manifest error or substantiated allegations that the procedure was not fair, transparent and objective, which was not the case. The Ombudsman found the EEAS’s explanation of its role, as well as its assessment of this case, was reasonable.
The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry finding no maladministration.
Omisión de acuse de recibo, por parte de la Comisión Europea, de una reclamación relativa a los proyectos de rehabilitación de la zona costera del sur de España
Viernes | 08 abril 2022
Decisión sobre el modo en que la Comisión Europea tramitó una denuncia contra la Comunidad Autónoma de Aragón por sus normas sobre el uso del carbón en las instalaciones de calefacción (asunto 407/2022/PL)
Martes | 15 marzo 2022
Decision on how the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) carried out a selection procedure for officers in its Standing Corps (case 56/2021/NH)
Viernes | 04 marzo 2022
The case concerned the decision by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) not to select the complainant as an officer in its Standing Corps following an interview as part of a selection procedure. The complainant argued that his application had received unjustifiably low scores. In addition, the complainant was concerned that Frontex did not allow him to request a review of the decision.
The Ombudsman found that the selection board set up by Frontex had followed the vacancy notice when scoring the complainant’s application. Frontex confirmed that it had processed the complainant’s request for review, but acknowledged that the information provided to the complainant may not have been clear. In the course of the inquiry, Frontex implemented changes in its practices, which the Ombudsman welcomed.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration by Frontex.
Forma en la que la Comisión abordó una denuncia en relación con una infracción del Derecho de la UE por parte de Polonia y otros Estados miembros
Viernes | 18 febrero 2022
Omisión de la debida respuesta, por parte de la Comisión Europea, a una solicitud relativa al certificado COVID digital de la UE
Martes | 11 enero 2022
Omisión por parte de la Comisión Europea del deber de mantener informado al reclamante sobre la situación de una denuncia de infracción relativa a períodos de prácticas en órganos jurisdiccionales italianos
Miércoles | 15 diciembre 2021
Omisión de respuesta por parte de la Comisión Europea a una denuncia de infracción relativa al presunto incumplimiento del Reglamento General de Protección de Datos (RGPD) por Irlanda
Viernes | 03 diciembre 2021
Decision concerning how the European Parliament Citizens' Inquiries Unit replied to a request concerning social security in Latvia (Complaint 1953/2021/LM)
Martes | 23 noviembre 2021
Query Q2/2021/OAM by the Catalan Ombudsman concerning the issuing of EU Digital COVID Certificates for those who have recovered from COVID-19 infections confirmed by antigen tests
Lunes | 22 noviembre 2021
Omisión de acuse de recibo, por parte de la Comisión Europea, de una reclamación contra el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
Lunes | 22 noviembre 2021
Report of the European Ombudsman closing query Q2/2021/OAM by the Catalan Ombudsman concerning the issuing of EU Digital COVID Certificates for those who have recovered from infections confirmed by antigen tests
Jueves | 18 noviembre 2021
Omisión de acuse de recibo, por parte de la Comisión Europea, de una reclamación contra Polonia relativa a los candidatos polacos a la judicatura del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos
Lunes | 15 noviembre 2021
Cómo tramitó el Servicio Europeo de Acción Exterior (SEAE) una reclamación por presunta falta de equidad en el procedimiento de preselección de profesionales subalternos en el programa de delegaciones
Viernes | 12 noviembre 2021
Decision on how the European Parliament dealt with traineeship applications from a person requesting special arrangements due to dyslexia (case 179/2021/VB)
Lunes | 08 noviembre 2021
The case was about how the European Parliament dealt with two traineeship applications from a person who requested special arrangements for his applications due to dyslexia.
After first having rejected the complainant’s application, Parliament decided to interview him and offered him a traineeship. As the complainant had a long absence from his traineeship for medical reasons, Parliament offered him the possibility to apply again. However, Parliament rejected the complainant’s new application.
The complainant took issue with how Parliament handled his traineeship applications and with how it informed him that he could reapply for a traineeship.
The Ombudsman finds that Parliament should have been clearer in its communication with the complainant regarding the possibility to apply for a second traineeship. However, she finds no maladministration in how Parliament dealt with the complainant’s traineeship applications. Similarly, the fact that Parliament deals with requests for special arrangements made by traineeship candidates on a case-by-case basis is a reasonable approach.
The Ombudsman makes a suggestion for improvement to Parliament regarding how it informs traineeship candidates of the possibility to request special assistance in the context of the application and selection procedure and of how they should make such a request.
Reply of the European Commission to the European Ombudsman letter regarding query Q2/2021/OAM
Martes | 28 septiembre 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission regarding the query Q2/2021/OAM by the Catalan Ombudsman concerning clarifications from the European Commission on the issuing of EU digital COVID recovery certificates
Viernes | 03 septiembre 2021