¿Tiene una reclamación contra una institución u órgano de la UE?
Consultar investigaciones
Mostrando 1 - 20 de 404 resultados
How the European Commission responded to concerns that it collects insufficient information about Ireland's implementation of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)
Viernes | 24 junio 2022
Decision in the case 345/2022/TM on how the European External Action Service dealt with a request that it disclose information on meetings between an EU mission and a third country
Viernes | 17 junio 2022
Decision concerning complaint 1023/2022/VS against the European Commission on how it replied to an e-mail concerning a complaint about an airline
Miércoles | 15 junio 2022
Decision on how the European Commission handled a complaint alleging an infringement of EU law by Poland as regards aircraft noise (case 257/2022/NH)
Martes | 14 junio 2022
How the European Commission dealt with a complaint that France violates freedom of movement for workers by deducting social security contributions from pensions originating from Switzerland (CHAP (2014)2212)
Miércoles | 08 junio 2022
Decision on how the European Commission (PMO) divided benefits derived from child allowances between two divorced EU staff members (case 1528/2021/FA)
Jueves | 02 junio 2022
The case concerned the decision by the European Commission’s Paymaster Office (PMO) to divide benefits derived from the child allowance between two divorced EU staff members. The complainant claimed that she should receive all derived benefits because she bears the majority of the costs for raising the child.
The Ombudsman finds the approach adopted by the PMO to decide on the division of derived benefits reasonable and in line with EU case-law. However, the Ombudsman finds that the PMO gave incoherent explanations to the complainant in its reply to her administrative complaint on the matter. However, with new internal administrative rules having been adopted that cover this area, the Ombudsman trusts that the PMO will ensure consistency in how the rules are applied and clarity in the information it gives to EU staff members.
The Ombudsman considered that no further inquiries were justified in this case and closed the inquiry.
Modo en que la Oficina Europea de Selección de Personal (EPSO) evaluó la solicitud de un candidato en un procedimiento de selección de secretarios/as (EPSO/AST-SC/10/20)
Martes | 31 mayo 2022
Decision on how the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) carried out a selection procedure for the position of legal officer (case 1818/2021/FA)
Viernes | 20 mayo 2022
The case concerned how the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation (Eurojust) carried out a selection procedure for the position of legal officer and assessed the complainant’s application.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a procedural error or a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the complainant’s application and therefore closed the case with a finding of no maladministration.
Decision on how the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assessed the complainant’s application in a selection procedure for the position of head of unit(case 2203/2021/FA)
Miércoles | 04 mayo 2022
The case concerned how the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) assessed the complainant’s application in a selection procedure for the position of head of unit. The complainant took issue with how EFSA assessed his application, both initially and following his request that it review its assessment, after which he was awarded a lower score.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a procedural error, or a manifest error in how the selection board assessed the complainant’s application in the CV screening phase and in the context of the request for review. The Ombudsman considered that EFSA acted in line with its obligations when communicating the results of the selection procedure and the review to the complainant. The Ombudsman also noted that nothing prevents selection boards from reducing the scores awarded to an applicant following the request for review. She therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Modo en que el Parlamento Europeo evaluó una prueba escrita en el procedimiento de selección de profesionales interculturales y lingüísticos (PE/AD/260/2021)
Lunes | 11 abril 2022
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with an infringement complaint against Spain concerning breach of EU law on pension schemes (case 396/2022/PL)
Martes | 15 marzo 2022
Omisión de actuación por parte de la Comisión Europea contra España por abuso en el número de contratos de duración determinada en el sector público español
Lunes | 14 marzo 2022
Falta de acuse de recibo por parte de la Comisión Europea de una denuncia relativa a la supuesta expedición de certificados COVID digitales de la UE falsificados en Italia
Viernes | 04 marzo 2022
Modo en que el Servicio Europeo de Acción Exterior tramitó la solicitud de divulgación de información sobre las reuniones entre una misión de la UE y un tercer país
Miércoles | 02 marzo 2022