Consultar investigaciones

Este caso concernía el modo en que el Parlamento Europeo evaluó la prueba escrita de la reclamante en un procedimiento de selección para la contratación de «profesionales de las lenguas y la interculturalidad».

La Defensora del Pueblo no encontró nada que sugiriera un error manifiesto en el modo en que el tribunal calificador evaluó la traducción de la reclamante. Por lo tanto, la Defensora dio por concluida la investigación sin constatar mala administración.

The case concerned the European Personnel Selection Office’s decision not to admit the complainant to a selection procedure for ‘experts in technical support to Member States’ structural reforms’, because she did not meet the eligibility requirements as regard the level of education and years of professional experience.

The Ombudsman found no manifest error in the selection board’s finding that the complainant did not fulfil the eligibility criteria. The Ombudsman thus closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.

The case concerned the time taken by the European Commission to deal with an appeal concerning its decision to apply a ‘medical reserve’ on a newly recruited staff member.

The Ombudsman wrote to the Commission reminding it that principles of good administration require EU institutions to take decisions within a reasonable time frame and that this is particularly important when the decision is related to the health of the person concerned and to social security cover.

Following updates from the Commission and the complainant showing that the Commission took a final decision on the appeal in March 2022, the Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that the substantive matter has been settled. The Ombudsman expects the Commission in future to handle similar procedures in a timely manner.