Mostrando 1 - 20 de 373 resultados
The decision by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) not to admit the complainant to the next stage of a selection procedure
Martes | 11 enero 2022
How the ceramic sector was assessed in the context of the European Commission’s revision of the 'State Aid Guidelines' for the EU's Emissions Trading Scheme
Martes | 21 diciembre 2021
Lunes | 20 diciembre 2021
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on how the ‘artificial graphite, colloidal or semi-colloidal graphite’ sub-sector was assessed in the context of the European Commission’s revision of the ‘State Aid Guidelines’ for the EU’s Emission Trading Scheme
Viernes | 17 diciembre 2021
Beslut beträffande Europeiska kommissionens besked till en EU-medborgare att Sveriges påstådda kränkning av hans rätt till ett effektivt rättsmedel inte faller under EU-rätten (ärende 1980/2021/PB)
Lunes | 06 diciembre 2021
How the European Commission is handling an appeals procedure concerning the imposition of a medical reserve on a newly recruited staff member
Lunes | 29 noviembre 2021
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a complaint about alleged violations of fundamental rights in Italy CHAP(2021)02649 (case 1861/2021/FA)
Jueves | 18 noviembre 2021
The European Parliament’s failure to respond to a complaint by an applicant in a selection procedure for contract staff in the area of surveillance and prevention
Martes | 16 noviembre 2021
How the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) applied a scoring methodology in two staff selection procedures
Lunes | 15 noviembre 2021
Cómo llevó a cabo la Agencia de la Unión Europea para la Cooperación Judicial Penal (Eurojust) un procedimiento de selección para un puesto de asesor jurídico
Martes | 09 noviembre 2021
Απόφαση επί της άρνησης της Επιτροπής Εποπτείας της Eυρωπαϊκής Υπηρεσίας Καταπολέμησης της Απάτης (OLAF) να επιληφθεί αίτησης επανεξέτασης απόφασης της OLAF επί καταγγελίας για παράτυπη διαχείριση κονδυλίων της ΕΕ εκ μέρους ελληνικού πανεπιστημίου (υπόθεση 1791/2021/KT)
Jueves | 04 noviembre 2021
Decision on how the European Commission monitored a school competition in Italy that it sponsors (case 1724/2021/FA)
Martes | 26 octubre 2021
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with a complaint against Denmark concerning a ban on the sale of flavoured e-cigarettes - CHAP (2021)00273 (case 1661/2021/FA)
Lunes | 11 octubre 2021
Decision on how the European Commission handled a complaint about how Italy transposed EU legislation on appropriate remuneration of doctors (case 1358/2020/LM)
Miércoles | 29 septiembre 2021
The case concerned how the European Commission handled a complaint alleging that Italy has failed to fully transpose Directive 82/76/CCE on the mutual recognition of diplomas in medicine into national law. The complainant contended that the Italian legislation transposing the Directive, as well as related case law, does not guarantee appropriate remuneration for all doctors who attended training for medical specialists from 1982 to 1991.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry asking the Commission to address in more detail the complainant’s arguments. In the course of the inquiry, the Commission set out its position that there was no breach of EU law in a clear and reasonable manner. The Ombudsman finds no manifest error by the Commission and thus closes the case with a finding of no maladministration.
La forma en que una misión civil de la UE tramitó la rescisión del contrato de un miembro del personal
Miércoles | 15 septiembre 2021
Decision in case 55/2021/PL on how the European Labour Authority assessed the professional experience of a candidate in a staff selection procedure for programming and reporting officers
Viernes | 23 julio 2021
The case concerned how the European Labour Authority’s (ELA) assessed the complainant’s professional experience in a selection procedure for recruiting programming and reporting officers.
The Ombudsman found nothing to suggest a manifest error in the selection committee’s assessment of the complainant’s qualifications. The Ombudsman therefore closed the inquiry with a finding of no maladministration.
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on its procedure for revising the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) State aid Guidelines, which no longer include the ‘Artificial graphite; colloidal or semi-colloidal graphite’ sub-sector
Miércoles | 21 julio 2021
Evaluación del sector cerámico en el contexto de la revisión de la Comisión Europea de las «Directrices sobre ayudas estatales» para el régimen de comercio de derechos de emisión de la UE
Miércoles | 21 julio 2021
How the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
Lunes | 05 julio 2021
Decision on how the European Commission dealt with the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers participating in the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (joint cases 1242/2020/SF and 1380/2020/SF)
Jueves | 01 julio 2021
The complaints concerned the European Commission’s decision not to extend funding for those carrying out research under the EU-funded Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action Programme (MSCA) following the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the work of researchers. The complainants considered that the measures the Commission put in place to support MSCA researchers during the COVID-19 crisis were insufficient, as they would not enable them to continue their work.
The Ombudsman opened an inquiry into how the Commission communicated with project partners that received grants under the MSCA, and the researchers carrying out the work for those project partners, about the measures they could take to address the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on their projects.
During the inquiry, the Ombudsman shared her preliminary findings with the Commission. In particular, the inquiry showed that, overall, the Commission had taken appropriate action to communicate the measures that could be taken to support researchers according to the applicable rules. However, as no solution had been found for the complainants, she urged the Commission to explore whether additional funding could exceptionally be awarded to the complainants and researchers in similarly difficult situations.
The Commission broadly accepted the Ombudsman’s preliminary findings but reiterated that, due to legal and financial constraints, it cannot provide any exceptional funding.
The Ombudsman appreciates the difficult situation faced by many MSCA researchers due to the COVID-19 crisis. At the same time, she acknowledges the Commission’s commitment to find solutions within the applicable rules for those researchers impacted. While it is regrettable that a solution could not be found for the complainants and researchers in similar situations, the Ombudsman closed the case as further inquiries would not result in a more satisfactory outcome for the complainants. However, she made two suggestions for improvement.