¿Tiene una reclamación contra una institución u órgano de la UE?
Consultar investigaciones
Mostrando 1 - 20 de 187 resultados
How the European Commission dealt with complaints against Poland as regards the EU-funded surveying works in south-eastern Poland and the Polish judiciary system
Sábado | 06 agosto 2022
The European Commission’s failure to reply to a letter concerning the EU-funded project in Southern Spain
Martes | 02 agosto 2022
Decisión por la que la Comisión Europea no ha tomado medidas contra España por abuso de contratos de duración determinada en el sector público español (349/2022/PL)
Miércoles | 06 julio 2022
Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Commission on its failure to take action against Spain for its abuse of fixed-term contracts in the Spanish public sector
Miércoles | 06 julio 2022
Omisión de actuación por parte de la Comisión Europea contra España por abuso en el número de contratos de duración determinada en el sector público español
Lunes | 14 marzo 2022
Falta de acuse de recibo por parte de la Comisión Europea de una denuncia relativa a la supuesta expedición de certificados COVID digitales de la UE falsificados en Italia
Viernes | 04 marzo 2022
Décision concernant la manière dont une Délégation de l’Union européenne a traité le remplacement d’un expert en raison d’un prétendu conflit d’intérêt (plainte : 1423/2021/JN)
Viernes | 26 noviembre 2021
Modo en que la Oficina Europea de Lucha contra el Fraude (OLAF) llevó a cabo una investigación sobre un presunto fraude por parte de dos miembros del personal de la UE
Martes | 06 julio 2021
Decision in case 193/2021/AMF on the European Anti-Fraud Office´s refusal to provide public access to a call for tenders for an EU funded project that was the object of an investigation
Jueves | 17 junio 2021
The case concerned a request for access to a public call for tenders for an EU funded project that was investigated by the European Anti-Fraud Office. OLAF had argued that providing the complainant with the call (which is already in the public domain) would damage its decision-making process and the purpose of its investigations because it would allow the complainant to identify the project in question and therefore the subject matter of the investigation. The Ombudsman´s inquiries team asked OLAF to clarify how its decision making process and the purpose of its investigations could be damaged when the call was public and the investigation was closed in 2019.
Taking into account the arguments put forward by OLAF in its reply to the Ombudsman´s inquiries team, the Ombudsman agreed that the disclosure of the call would undermine OLAF´s decision-making process and the purpose of its investigations. Therefore, the inquiry was closed with a finding of no maladministration.
Negativa de la Oficina Europea Anti-Fraude a proporcionar acceso público a una licitación para un proyecto financiado por la UE que era objeto de una investigación
Jueves | 18 marzo 2021
Decision of the European Ombudsman in the case 119/2020/JN on how the European Court of Auditors handled a complaint about alleged irregularities in a public procurement procedure
Jueves | 11 febrero 2021
Die Entscheidung des Europäischen Amtes für Betrugsbekämpfung (OLAF), keine Untersuchung eines möglichen Missbrauchs von EU-Mitteln in Dänemark einzuleiten
Martes | 05 enero 2021
Falta de respuesta de la Oficina Europea de Lucha contra el Fraude (OLAF) a una solicitud de información relativa a una actividad de investigación
Miércoles | 02 diciembre 2020
Decisión de la Comisión Europea de incluir al denunciante en el Sistema de Detección Precoz y Exclusión (EDES)
Viernes | 27 noviembre 2020
Le refus de l´OLAF de donner accès à un rapport final d’enquête à la personne concernée par l’enquête en question
Jueves | 19 noviembre 2020
Decision in case 1597/2020/EIS on how the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union replied to a request for legal help in a personal matter
Jueves | 08 octubre 2020
Decision in case OI/2/2020/NH on the European Anti-Fraud Office’s refusal to grant public access to documents related to its investigation of possible links between Japan Tobacco International (JTI) and a family member of the Syrian President
Miércoles | 29 julio 2020
The case concerned how the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) handled a request by a journalist for public access to documents about an OLAF investigation into a tobacco product manufacturer and its possible links to a family member of the Syrian President.
OLAF invoked the general presumption that public access to the requested documents would be particularly detrimental to its ability to fulfil its mission to fight fraud in the public interest. OLAF therefore concluded, without assessing each document individually, that access to the documents could not be granted.
The Ombudsman found that OLAF had correctly applied the EU rules on public access to documents. After reviewing the final OLAF report in this case, the Ombudsman found that only one short section was relevant to the complainant’s request.
The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with a finding that there had not been maladministration by OLAF. She nevertheless suggested to OLAF that it assess the relevant section of the report and consider granting public access to it.