Letter from the European Ombudsman to the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights opening own-initiative inquiry OI/4/2013/CK concerning the EU Agencies
Correspondence - Date Monday | 12 August 2013
Case OI/4/2013/CK - Opened on Monday | 12 August 2013 - Decision on Friday | 16 May 2014 - Institutions concerned Body of European Regulators for Electronic Communications | Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency | European Asylum Support Office | European Banking Authority | European Defence Agency | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority | European Medicines Agency | European Research Council Executive Agency | EURATOM Supply Agency | European Securities and Markets Authority | European Systemic Risk Board | European Union Intellectual Property Office | European Union Institute for Security Studies | Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training | Community Plant Variety Office | Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency | Executive Agency for Competitiveness and Innovation | European Union Aviation Safety Agency | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control | European Chemicals Agency | European Environment Agency | European Food Safety Authority | European Institute of Innovation and Technology | European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction | European Maritime Safety Agency | European Union Agency for Cybersecurity | European Union Agency for Railways | European Training Foundation | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions | Eurojust | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation | European Union Fundamental Rights Agency | European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) | European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work | Research Executive Agency | Trans-European Transport Network Executive Agency
Mr Morten Kjærum
Own-initiative inquiry OI/4/2013/CK concerning the EU Agencies
Dear Mr Kjærum,
On 30 April 2013, in the decision closing own-initiative inquiry OI/4/2012/CK concerning the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop), I announced my intention to examine, in the framework of an own-initiative inquiry, the different practices adopted by the EU Agencies regarding the issue of disclosure of the names of Selection Board members.
At the outset, I note that views as to the correct balance between openness and the legitimate needs of confidentiality in the work of selection boards have evolved in the direction of giving greater weight to openness. Both EPSO and the Commission have an established practice, whereby they disclose the names of the members of selection boards. Such a practice guarantees transparency in selection procedures and allows candidates to ascertain that the selection procedure has not been vitiated by conflicts of interest. It thus helps to build and maintain public trust in the EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies.
In the course of visits to a number of Agencies, I realised that some of them have not yet adapted their practices to those of EPSO and the Commission, or had not yet considered the issue. Of the Agencies that I have visited, only the European Environment Agency (EEA) has an established proactive policy of making available to the public the names of selection board members through its website. I made a number of suggestions going in that direction in discussions with the other Agencies that were visited. The reactions to my suggestions were also diverse. While the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) endorsed the Ombudsman's suggestions to provide the names of selection board members to all candidates, some agencies hesitated to proceed to such disclosure.
The diversity in the approaches adopted by the different Agencies and their reactions to my suggestion motivated my decision to proceed with an own-initiative inquiry on this issue that covers all the EU Agencies.
Since I have not yet visited FRA or had the opportunity to exchange views with it on this issue, I would be very grateful if it could clarify its policy as regards disclosure of the names of selection board members. In particular, I would invite FRA to reply to the following questions:
1. Are the names of selection board members disclosed to candidates? If so, at which stage of the selection procedure? Are the names published proactively, or are they made available upon request?
2. In case your Agency has adopted a proactive policy of disclosing the names of selection board members, what are the measures it has taken in order to ensure compliance with data protection requirements?
I invite you to provide the requested clarifications by 30 November 2013.
Mrs Christina Karakosta (tel: +32 228 41141), a Legal Officer within Unit 3, will be responsible for dealing with this own-initiative inquiry.
P. Nikiforos Diamandouros