• Make a complaint
  • Request for information
60th Rome Treaty anniversaryYour Europe - The portal to on-line European and national public services

Alleged conflict of interest on EESC committee as regards Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity

Available languages: en
  • Case: 570/2015/PL
    Opened on 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on 19 Sep 2016, 19 Sep 2016 - Decision on 01 Jun 2017, 01 Jun 2017
  • Case: 577/2015/PL
    Opened on 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on 19 Sep 2016, 19 Sep 2016 - Decision on 01 Jun 2017, 01 Jun 2017
  • Case: 619/2015/PL
    Opened on 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on 19 Sep 2016, 19 Sep 2016 - Decision on 01 Jun 2017, 01 Jun 2017
  • Case: 500/2015/PL
    Opened on 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on 19 Sep 2016 - Decision on 01 Jun 2017
  • Case: 650/2015/PL
    Opened on 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on 19 Sep 2016, 19 Sep 2016 - Decision on 01 Jun 2017, 01 Jun 2017
  • Case: 635/2015/PL
    Opened on 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on 19 Sep 2016, 19 Sep 2016 - Decision on 01 Jun 2017, 01 Jun 2017
  • Case: 561/2015/PL
    Opened on 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015, 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on 19 Sep 2016, 19 Sep 2016 - Decision on 02 Jun 2017, 01 Jun 2017

Allegation(s)

1) The EESC does not properly examine issues of potential conflict of interest of its members, and failed to act when faced with an alleged conflict of interest of one of its members in the present case.

2) The EESC failed to follow the established procedure when adopting its opinion on "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity".

Claim(s)

1) The EESC should, in general, properly deal with potential conflict of interest of its members and, in particular, address the matter of the alleged conflict of interest of one of its members.

2) The EESC should annul the vote held on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.

Related documents