You have a complaint against an EU institution or body?

Make a complaint
HomeCase
Available languages:
  • ENEnglish

Alleged conflict of interest on EESC committee as regards Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity

Case opened
Case 500/2015/PL - Opened on Wednesday | 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on Monday | 19 September 2016 - Decision on Thursday | 01 June 2017 - Institution concerned European Economic and Social Committee (Recommendation agreed by the institution )
Case 561/2015/PL - Opened on Wednesday | 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on Monday | 19 September 2016 - Decision on Friday | 02 June 2017 - Institution concerned European Economic and Social Committee (Recommendation agreed by the institution )
Case 577/2015/PL - Opened on Wednesday | 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on Monday | 19 September 2016 - Decision on Thursday | 01 June 2017 - Institution concerned European Economic and Social Committee (Recommendation agreed by the institution )
Case 570/2015/PL - Opened on Wednesday | 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on Monday | 19 September 2016 - Decision on Thursday | 01 June 2017 - Institution concerned European Economic and Social Committee (Recommendation agreed by the institution )
Case 619/2015/PL - Opened on Wednesday | 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on Monday | 19 September 2016 - Decision on Thursday | 01 June 2017 - Institution concerned European Economic and Social Committee (Recommendation agreed by the institution )
Case 635/2015/PL - Opened on Wednesday | 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on Monday | 19 September 2016 - Decision on Thursday | 01 June 2017 - Institution concerned European Economic and Social Committee (Recommendation agreed by the institution )
Case 650/2015/PL - Opened on Wednesday | 13 May 2015 - Recommendation on Monday | 19 September 2016 - Decision on Thursday | 01 June 2017 - Institution concerned European Economic and Social Committee (Recommendation agreed by the institution )

Allegation(s)

1) The EESC does not properly examine issues of potential conflict of interest of its members, and failed to act when faced with an alleged conflict of interest of one of its members in the present case.

2) The EESC failed to follow the established procedure when adopting its opinion on "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity".

Claim(s)

1) The EESC should, in general, properly deal with potential conflict of interest of its members and, in particular, address the matter of the alleged conflict of interest of one of its members.

2) The EESC should annul the vote held on Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity.

Related documents