Sie möchten Beschwerde gegen ein EU-Organ oder eine EU-Einrichtung einlegen?
Untersuchungen suchen
Anzeige 1-20 der 791 Treffer
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents related to EU environmental strategy and legislation
Donnerstag | 04 August 2022
How the European Commission dealt with complaints against Poland as regards the EU-funded surveying works in south-eastern Poland and the Polish judiciary system
Samstag | 06 August 2022
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to documents related to EU environmental strategy and legislation
Dienstag | 02 August 2022
Letter to the European Commission on how the institution dealt with a request for public access to documents related to EU environmental strategy and legislation
Dienstag | 02 August 2022
The European Commission’s failure to acknowledge receipt of several infringement complaints against Germany
Donnerstag | 04 August 2022
The European Parliament’s failure to reply to an administrative complaint concerning its decision to change the nature of the contract under which a conference interpreter was employed
Donnerstag | 04 August 2022
How the European Commission dealt with a request for public access to a trucks cartel decision
Mittwoch | 20 Juli 2022
The European Commission's failure to reply to objections made under the EU Lift Directive against a measure taken by a national surveillance authority
Freitag | 22 Juli 2022
Decision on the time taken by the European Parliament to deal with a request to recognise that a staff member’s medical condition is an ‘occupational disease’ (case 286/2022/VS)
Dienstag | 19 Juli 2022
The case concerned the time taken by the European Parliament to deal with a staff member’s request to recognise her condition as an ‘occupational disease’.
The Ombudsman wrote to the Parliament reminding it that principles of good administration require EU institutions to take decisions within a reasonable time frame and that this is particularly important when the decision is related to the health of the person concerned.
Following updates from the Parliament and the complainant showing that the Parliament had taken a decision on the request in June 2022, the Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that the matter has been settled.
Decision on the time taken by the European Commission to handle an appeal concerning the decision to apply a ‘medical reserve’ on a newly recruited staff member (case 1609/2021/VS)
Freitag | 15 Juli 2022
The case concerned the time taken by the European Commission to deal with an appeal concerning its decision to apply a ‘medical reserve’ on a newly recruited staff member.
The Ombudsman wrote to the Commission reminding it that principles of good administration require EU institutions to take decisions within a reasonable time frame and that this is particularly important when the decision is related to the health of the person concerned and to social security cover.
Following updates from the Commission and the complainant showing that the Commission took a final decision on the appeal in March 2022, the Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that the substantive matter has been settled. The Ombudsman expects the Commission in future to handle similar procedures in a timely manner.
The SESAR 3 Joint Undertaking and its failure to reply to an appeal in the selection procedure for the post of financial officer (ref. VN224)
Freitag | 15 Juli 2022
Decision on how the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) dealt with a Horizon 2020 funding proposal for the Enhanced European Innovation Council Accelerator Pilot (case 2097/2021/FA)
Freitag | 15 Juli 2022
The case concerned how the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (EASME) dealt with a proposal for funding under the Enhanced European Innovation Council (EIC) Accelerator Pilot.
The complainant took issue with how EASME evaluated its proposal as well as with the lack of information received on the evaluation and possibilities for review. The complainant was also concerned with the delay by EASME in replying to his request that it review its decision.
In the course of the inquiry, the European Innovation Council and SME Executive Agency (EISMEA), which succeeded and replaced EASME, explained why there was a delay in the review procedure. The Ombudsman considered that the explanation was reasonable. The Ombudsman also found that EASME had provided sufficient information to the complainant on the evaluation and possibilities for review. Nevertheless, the Ombudsman found that the feedback provided by EASME to the complainant was not sufficient, and did not allow a meaningful review of the evaluation of the proposal. The Ombudsman noted that, in the context of the new EIC Accelerator programme, EISMEA appears to provide more detailed feedback to applicants on the evaluation of their proposals.
The Ombudsman thus considered that no further inquiries were justified in this case and closed the inquiry.
The European Parliament’s failure to reply to an administrative complaint alleging discrimination against a candidate with a disability in an internal staff selection procedure
Freitag | 01 Juli 2022
The European Commission's failure to keep the complainant informed on the state of play of an infringement complaint against Germany
Donnerstag | 30 Juni 2022
The failure by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) to reply to a request for public access to documents related to operations at the Greek-Turkish border
Dienstag | 21 Juni 2022
The European Union Agency for Asylum’s (EUAA) failure to reply to a complaint concerning an alleged irregularity in a selection procedure for Content Management Officer
Dienstag | 21 Juni 2022
The European Commission’s failure to reply to a request and concerns regarding its handling of an infringement complaint concerning Germany’s implementation of EU anti-money laundering legislation – CHAP(2020)2935
Donnerstag | 16 Juni 2022
Decision on how the European Commission applied the moderation policy for its staff intranet to a post on a discussion forum (case 9/2022/NH)
Mittwoch | 01 Juni 2022
The case concerned a message related to the COVID-19 pandemic that was posted on the European Commission’s intranet forum, which is reserved for Commission staff members. The complainant, a Commission staff member, had reported the message as hate speech and wanted the Commission to remove it. The Commission refused and the complainant turned to the Ombudsman.
The Ombudsman found that the Commission’s decision not to remove the message was reasonable because it did not consider the message to be hate speech or contrary to its moderation policy. The Ombudsman closed the inquiry with the conclusion that there was no maladministration in this case.