Sie möchten Beschwerde gegen ein EU-Organ oder eine EU-Einrichtung einlegen?

Untersuchungen suchen

Text-Suche

Art des Dokuments

Betroffene Institution

Art der Beilegung

Fall-Nummer

Sprache

Datums-Bereich

Schlüsselwörter

Grundrechte

Oder versuchen Sie alte Stichwörter (vor 2016)

Anzeige 1-20 der 363 Treffer

Entscheidung im Fall 987/2020/EWM über den Umgang des Europäischen Auswärtigen Dienstes mit Bedenken in Bezug auf ein sicheres Instant-Messaging-System und eine potenzielle Datenschutz-Folgenabschätzung sowie einen Antrag auf Zugang der Öffentlichkeit zu den entsprechenden Dokumenten

Dienstag | 15 September 2020

Die Beschwerde betraf die Weigerung des Europäischen Auswärtigen Dienstes (EAD), den Zugang der Öffentlichkeit zu Dokumenten über ein sicheres Instant-Messaging-System zu gewähren, das für den Austausch von sensiblen Informationen und Verschlusssachen innerhalb des EAD verwendet wird. Der EAD hat erklärt, dass die Offenlegung der Dokumente die öffentliche Sicherheit gefährden würde.

Die Bürgerbeauftragte hat den Inhalt der Dokumente geprüft und ist auf dieser Grundlage ebenfalls der Auffassung, dass der EAD Grund hatte, den Zugang der Öffentlichkeit zu verweigern. Sie konnte daher keinen Missstand feststellen und schloss den Fall ab.

Decision in case 1233/2019/MMO on how the European Commission ensures that Member State governments spend European Structural and Investment Funds in line with the obligations stemming from the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities

Donnerstag | 30 Juli 2020

The case concerned the use of European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI funds) for the construction of institutional care facilities for persons with disabilities in Hungary and Portugal. The complainant considered that the European Commission should have taken action on these projects, as it believed them to be at odds with the EU’s obligations to ensure people with disabilities are supported to live independently and to be included in the community.

The Ombudsman already had occasion, in the course of an earlier inquiry, to set out her views on the use of ESI funds on institutions rather than to promote independent living. The Ombudsman was encouraged by the Commission’s follow-up to her suggestions in that case, received in the course of this inquiry, and in particular the greater ambition it is showing for the 2021-27 programming period.

In this case, the Ombudsman finds that, as regards the first phase of the ‘deinstitutionalisation’ process in Hungary, the Commission has not acted in a sufficiently timely manner. Due to the lessons learnt in that phase, however, the Commission has shown greater caution as regards the use of ESI funds to continue the deinstitutionalisation process in that Member State. In the case of Portugal, the Ombudsman trusts that the Commission will act upon the findings and recommendations of the UN and the upcoming expert report in an effective manner.

On this basis, the Ombudsman closes the inquiry. She will now examine with the members of the European Network of Ombudsmen the need for further work in this area, in particular in light of the problems encountered in institutional care facilities during the COVID-19 pandemic. She also sets out three suggestions for improvement to address the issues identified in this case.